Executar análise estática (SAST) na base de código à procura do padrão inseguro no fluxo de dados.
Incorrect Decoding of Security Identifiers
This vulnerability occurs when a hardware decoder incorrectly interprets security identifiers in bus transactions, allowing untrusted agents to gain unauthorized access to protected assets.
What is CWE-1290?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-1290
Ainda não há referências CVE públicas associadas a este CWE no catálogo da MITRE.
Trajeto do atacante passo a passo
- 1
Consider a system that has four bus masters and a decoder. The decoder is supposed to decode every bus transaction and assign a corresponding security identifier. The security identifier is used to determine accesses to the assets. The bus transaction that contains the security information is Bus_transaction [15:14], and the bits 15 through 14 contain the security identifier information. The table below provides bus masters as well as their security identifiers and trust assumptions: | Bus Master | Security Identifier Decoding | Trust Assumptions | | --- | --- | --- | | Master_0 | "00" | Untrusted | | Master_1 | "01" | Trusted | | Master_2 | "10" | Untrusted | | Master_3 | "11" | Untrusted | The assets are the AES-Key registers for encryption or decryption. The key is 128 bits implemented as a set of four 32-bit registers. The AES_KEY_ACCESS_POLICY is used to define which agents with a security identifier in the transaction can access the AES-key registers. The size of the security identifier is 4 bits (i.e., bit 3 through 0). Each bit in these 4 bits defines a security identifier. There are only 4 security identifiers that are allowed accesses to the AES-key registers. The number of the bit when set (i.e., "1") allows respective action from an agent whose identity matches the number of the bit. If clear (i.e., "0"), disallows the respective action to that corresponding agent. | Register | Field description | | --- | --- | | AES_ENC_DEC_KEY_0 | AES key [0:31] for encryption or decryption Default 0x00000000 | | AES_ENC_DEC_KEY_1 | AES key [32:63] for encryption or decryption Default 0x00000000 | | AES_ENC_DEC_KEY_2 | AES key [64:95] for encryption or decryption Default 0x00000000 | | AES_ENC_DEC_KEY_3 | AES key [96:127] for encryption or decryption Default 0x00000000 | | AES_KEY_ACCESS_POLCY | [31:4] Default 0x00000000 [3:0]-0x01 agent with Security Identified "1" has access to AES_ENC_DEC_KEY_0 through AES_ENC_DEC_KEY_3 registers |
- 2
The following Pseudo code outlines the process of checking the value of the Security Identifier within the AES_KEY_ACCESS_POLICY register:
- 3
Below is a decoder's Pseudo code that only checks for bit [14] of the bus transaction to determine what Security Identifier it must assign.
- 4
The security identifier is two bits, but the decoder code above only checks the value of one bit. Two Masters have their bit 0 set to "1" - Master_1 and Master_3. Master_1 is trusted, while Master_3 is not. The code above would therefore allow an untrusted agent, Master_3, access to the AES-Key registers in addition to intended trusted Master_1. The decoder should check for the entire size of the security identifier in the bus-transaction signal to assign a corresponding security identifier. The following is good Pseudo code:
Vulnerable Other
Below is a decoder's Pseudo code that only checks for bit [14] of the bus transaction to determine what Security Identifier it must assign.
If (Bus_transaction[14] == "1")
Security_Identifier == "1"
Else
Security_Identifier == "0" Secure Other
The security identifier is two bits, but the decoder code above only checks the value of one bit. Two Masters have their bit 0 set to "1" - Master_1 and Master_3. Master_1 is trusted, while Master_3 is not. The code above would therefore allow an untrusted agent, Master_3, access to the AES-Key registers in addition to intended trusted Master_1. The decoder should check for the entire size of the security identifier in the bus-transaction signal to assign a corresponding security identifier. The following is good Pseudo code:
If (Bus_transaction[15:14] == "00")
Security_Identifier == "0"
If (Bus_transaction[15:14] == "01")
Security_Identifier == "1"
If (Bus_transaction[15:14] == "10")
Security_Identifier == "2"
If (Bus_transaction[15:14] == "11")
Security_Identifier == "3" How to prevent CWE-1290
- Architecture and Design Security identifier decoders must be reviewed for design consistency and common weaknesses.
- Implementation Access and programming flows must be tested in pre-silicon and post-silicon testing in order to check for this weakness.
How to detect CWE-1290
Executar testes dinâmicos de segurança de aplicações (DAST) contra o endpoint em execução.
Monitorizar os registos em tempo de execução para traços de exceção invulgares, input malformado ou tentativas de contornar a autorização.
Revisão de código: sinalizar qualquer novo código que trate input desta superfície sem usar os ajudantes validados do framework.
O Plexicus deteta automaticamente o CWE-1290 e abre um PR de correção em menos de 60 segundos.
O Codex Remedium analisa cada commit, identifica esta fraqueza exata e entrega um pull request pronto para revisão com o patch. Sem tickets. Sem transferências.
Frequently asked questions
O que é o CWE-1290?
This vulnerability occurs when a hardware decoder incorrectly interprets security identifiers in bus transactions, allowing untrusted agents to gain unauthorized access to protected assets.
Qual a gravidade do CWE-1290?
A MITRE não publicou uma classificação de probabilidade de exploração para esta fraqueza. Trate-a como impacto médio até o seu modelo de ameaças provar o contrário.
Que linguagens ou plataformas são afetadas pelo CWE-1290?
MITRE lists the following affected platforms: Not OS-Specific, Not Architecture-Specific, Bus/Interface Hardware, Not Technology-Specific.
Como posso prevenir o CWE-1290?
Security identifier decoders must be reviewed for design consistency and common weaknesses. Access and programming flows must be tested in pre-silicon and post-silicon testing in order to check for this weakness.
Como é que o Plexicus deteta e corrige o CWE-1290?
O motor SAST do Plexicus correlaciona a assinatura de fluxo de dados do CWE-1290 em cada commit. Quando é encontrada uma correspondência, o nosso agente Codex Remedium abre um PR de correção com o código corrigido, testes e um resumo de uma linha para o revisor.
Onde posso saber mais sobre o CWE-1290?
A MITRE publica a definição canónica em https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1290.html. Pode também consultar a documentação da OWASP e do NIST para orientações adjacentes.
Weaknesses related to CWE-1290
Improper Access Control
The software fails to properly limit who can access a resource, allowing unauthorized users or systems to interact with it.
On-Chip Debug and Test Interface With Improper Access Control
This vulnerability occurs when a hardware chip's debug or test interface (like JTAG) lacks proper access controls. Without correct…
Insufficient Granularity of Access Control
This vulnerability occurs when a system's access controls are too broad, allowing unauthorized users or processes to read or modify…
Improper Restriction of Write-Once Bit Fields
This vulnerability occurs when hardware write-once protection mechanisms, often called 'sticky bits,' are incorrectly implemented,…
Improper Prevention of Lock Bit Modification
This vulnerability occurs when hardware or firmware uses a lock bit to protect critical system registers or memory regions, but fails to…
Security-Sensitive Hardware Controls with Missing Lock Bit Protection
This vulnerability occurs when a hardware device uses a lock bit to protect critical configuration registers, but the lock fails to…
CPU Hardware Not Configured to Support Exclusivity of Write and Execute Operations
This vulnerability occurs when a CPU's hardware is not set up to enforce a strict separation between writing data to memory and executing…
Improper Access Control Applied to Mirrored or Aliased Memory Regions
This vulnerability occurs when a hardware design maps the same physical memory to multiple addresses (aliasing or mirroring) but fails to…
Improper Restriction of Security Token Assignment
This vulnerability occurs when a System-on-a-Chip (SoC) fails to properly secure its Security Token mechanism. These tokens control which…
Pare de pagar por desenvolvedor.
Comece a fechar o ciclo.
O Plexicus é o ASPM nativo de IA que verifica, filtra, corrige, pentesta e explica — de forma autónoma. Programadores ilimitados, repos ilimitados, ações de IA de utilização justa. Nível gratuito real, €269/mo anual quando estiver pronto.