CWE-150 Variante Incompleto

Improper Neutralization of Escape, Meta, or Control Sequences

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly sanitize or escape special character sequences in user-supplied input before passing that data to another system or component.…

Definição

What is CWE-150?

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly sanitize or escape special character sequences in user-supplied input before passing that data to another system or component. Attackers can inject escape, meta, or control sequences to manipulate how the downstream component interprets the data, often leading to command execution, data corruption, or unauthorized actions.
Think of this flaw as a broken translation step in data processing. When an application receives input—like a filename, a database query, or a command argument—it must treat special characters (like newlines, escape codes, or terminal control sequences) as literal data, not as instructions. If the application doesn't correctly neutralize these sequences, the downstream component (e.g., a shell, parser, or terminal) will misinterpret them, executing unintended commands or altering the program's expected flow. In practice, this often manifests when delimiters are missing, malformed, or injected by an attacker. For example, an unescaped newline in a log file could be interpreted as a command separator, or a crafted escape sequence could clear a terminal screen or manipulate output. To prevent this, developers must explicitly define and validate data boundaries, ensuring all special control characters are escaped or encoded according to the specific context of the receiving component.
Impacto no mundo real

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-150

  • The mail program processes special "~" escape sequence even when not in interactive mode.

  • Setuid program does not filter escape sequences before calling mail program.

  • Mail function does not filter control characters from arguments, allowing mail message content to be modified.

  • Multi-channel issue. Terminal escape sequences not filtered from log files.

  • Multi-channel issue. Terminal escape sequences not filtered from log files.

  • Terminal escape sequences not filtered by terminals when displaying files.

  • Terminal escape sequences not filtered by terminals when displaying files.

  • Terminal escape sequences not filtered by terminals when displaying files.

Como os atacantes a exploram

Trajeto do atacante passo a passo

  1. 1

    Identificar um caminho de código que trata input não confiável sem validação.

  2. 2

    Criar um payload que explora o comportamento inseguro — injeção, traversal, overflow ou abuso de lógica.

  3. 3

    Entregar o payload através de um pedido normal e observar a reação da aplicação.

  4. 4

    Iterar até que a resposta exponha dados, execute código do atacante ou escale privilégios.

Exemplo de código vulnerável

Vulnerable pseudo

A MITRE não publicou um exemplo de código para este CWE. O padrão abaixo é ilustrativo — consulte os Recursos para referências canónicas.

Vulnerável pseudo
// Example pattern — see MITRE for the canonical references.
function handleRequest(input) {
  // Untrusted input flows directly into the sensitive sink.
  return executeUnsafe(input);
}
Exemplo de código seguro

Secure pseudo

Seguro pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Lista de verificação de prevenção

How to prevent CWE-150

  • Developers should anticipate that escape, meta and control characters/sequences will be injected/removed/manipulated in the input vectors of their product. Use an appropriate combination of denylists and allowlists to ensure only valid, expected and appropriate input is processed by the system.
  • Implementation Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
  • Implementation While it is risky to use dynamically-generated query strings, code, or commands that mix control and data together, sometimes it may be unavoidable. Properly quote arguments and escape any special characters within those arguments. The most conservative approach is to escape or filter all characters that do not pass an extremely strict allowlist (such as everything that is not alphanumeric or white space). If some special characters are still needed, such as white space, wrap each argument in quotes after the escaping/filtering step. Be careful of argument injection (CWE-88).
  • Implementation Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist validation schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked.
Sinais de deteção

How to detect CWE-150

SAST High

Executar análise estática (SAST) na base de código à procura do padrão inseguro no fluxo de dados.

DAST Moderate

Executar testes dinâmicos de segurança de aplicações (DAST) contra o endpoint em execução.

Runtime Moderate

Monitorizar os registos em tempo de execução para traços de exceção invulgares, input malformado ou tentativas de contornar a autorização.

Code review Moderate

Revisão de código: sinalizar qualquer novo código que trate input desta superfície sem usar os ajudantes validados do framework.

Correção automática do Plexicus

O Plexicus deteta automaticamente o CWE-150 e abre um PR de correção em menos de 60 segundos.

O Codex Remedium analisa cada commit, identifica esta fraqueza exata e entrega um pull request pronto para revisão com o patch. Sem tickets. Sem transferências.

Perguntas frequentes

Frequently asked questions

O que é o CWE-150?

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly sanitize or escape special character sequences in user-supplied input before passing that data to another system or component. Attackers can inject escape, meta, or control sequences to manipulate how the downstream component interprets the data, often leading to command execution, data corruption, or unauthorized actions.

Qual a gravidade do CWE-150?

A MITRE não publicou uma classificação de probabilidade de exploração para esta fraqueza. Trate-a como impacto médio até o seu modelo de ameaças provar o contrário.

Que linguagens ou plataformas são afetadas pelo CWE-150?

A MITRE não especificou as plataformas afetadas por este CWE — pode aplicar-se à maioria das stacks de aplicações.

Como posso prevenir o CWE-150?

Developers should anticipate that escape, meta and control characters/sequences will be injected/removed/manipulated in the input vectors of their product. Use an appropriate combination of denylists and allowlists to ensure only valid, expected and appropriate input is processed by the system. Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not…

Como é que o Plexicus deteta e corrige o CWE-150?

O motor SAST do Plexicus correlaciona a assinatura de fluxo de dados do CWE-150 em cada commit. Quando é encontrada uma correspondência, o nosso agente Codex Remedium abre um PR de correção com o código corrigido, testes e um resumo de uma linha para o revisor.

Onde posso saber mais sobre o CWE-150?

A MITRE publica a definição canónica em https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/150.html. Pode também consultar a documentação da OWASP e do NIST para orientações adjacentes.

Fraquezas relacionadas

Weaknesses related to CWE-150

CWE-138 Pai

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements

This vulnerability occurs when an application accepts external input but fails to properly sanitize special characters or syntax that have…

CWE-140 Irmão

Improper Neutralization of Delimiters

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly handle or sanitize delimiter characters within data inputs, allowing them…

CWE-147 Irmão

Improper Neutralization of Input Terminators

This vulnerability occurs when an application accepts external input but fails to properly handle special characters that downstream…

CWE-148 Irmão

Improper Neutralization of Input Leaders

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly validate or handle input that begins with special control characters or…

CWE-149 Irmão

Improper Neutralization of Quoting Syntax

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly validate or escape quote characters (like single ' or double " quotes) in…

CWE-151 Irmão

Improper Neutralization of Comment Delimiters

This vulnerability occurs when an application accepts user input and fails to properly sanitize characters that can be interpreted as…

CWE-152 Irmão

Improper Neutralization of Macro Symbols

This vulnerability occurs when an application accepts user input containing macro symbols (like those used in templates or configuration…

CWE-153 Irmão

Improper Neutralization of Substitution Characters

This vulnerability occurs when an application accepts user input and fails to properly sanitize special characters that can trigger…

CWE-154 Irmão

Improper Neutralization of Variable Name Delimiters

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly sanitize or escape special characters that act as delimiters for variable…

Pronto quando você estiver

Pare de pagar por desenvolvedor.
Comece a fechar o ciclo.

O Plexicus é o ASPM nativo de IA que verifica, filtra, corrige, pentesta e explica — de forma autónoma. Programadores ilimitados, repos ilimitados, ações de IA de utilização justa. Nível gratuito real, €269/mo anual quando estiver pronto.