CWE-346 Classe Rascunho

Origin Validation Error

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly confirm the true origin of incoming data or communication, allowing attackers to spoof their source.

Definição

What is CWE-346?

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly confirm the true origin of incoming data or communication, allowing attackers to spoof their source.
Origin Validation Errors happen because applications often trust metadata like IP addresses, DNS names, or HTTP headers that can be easily forged. Attackers exploit this by impersonating legitimate systems, tricking the application into accepting malicious data as if it came from a trusted source. This is a fundamental flaw in the trust boundary of the system. To prevent this, developers must implement robust verification mechanisms that rely on unforgeable credentials, such as cryptographic signatures or secure tokens, rather than easily spoofed information. Always validate the origin at the point of trust establishment and consistently enforce this check for all subsequent interactions.
Impacto no mundo real

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-346

  • DNS server can accept DNS updates from hosts that it did not query, leading to cache poisoning

  • Browser does not set Mark-of-the-Web (MotW) for a downloaded .EXE file if the name is close to the maximum path length, preventing recording of a zone identifier in the filename

  • Zip file extraction program does not propagate Mark-of-the-Web (MotW) metadata to files that are extracted from an Internet-downloaded Zip file

  • Zip file extraction program does not propagate Mark-of-the-Web (MotW) metadata to files that are extracted from an Internet-downloaded Zip file

  • DNS server can accept DNS updates from hosts that it did not query, leading to cache poisoning

  • DNS server caches glue records received from non-delegated name servers

  • user ID obtained from untrusted source (URL)

  • LDAP service does not verify if a particular attribute was set by the LDAP server

Como os atacantes a exploram

Trajeto do atacante passo a passo

  1. 1

    This Android application will remove a user account when it receives an intent to do so:

  2. 2

    This application does not check the origin of the intent, thus allowing any malicious application to remove a user. Always check the origin of an intent, or create an allowlist of trusted applications using the manifest.xml file.

  3. 3

    These Android and iOS applications intercept URL loading within a WebView and perform special actions if a particular URL scheme is used, thus allowing the Javascript within the WebView to communicate with the application:

  4. 4

    A call into native code can then be initiated by passing parameters within the URL:

  5. 5

    Because the application does not check the source, a malicious website loaded within this WebView has the same access to the API as a trusted site.

Exemplo de código vulnerável

Vulnerable Java

This Android application will remove a user account when it receives an intent to do so:

Vulnerável Java
IntentFilter filter = new IntentFilter("com.example.RemoveUser");
  MyReceiver receiver = new MyReceiver();
  registerReceiver(receiver, filter);
  public class DeleteReceiver extends BroadcastReceiver {
  	@Override
  	public void onReceive(Context context, Intent intent) {
  		int userID = intent.getIntExtra("userID");
  		destroyUserData(userID);
  	}
  }
Payload do atacante

A call into native code can then be initiated by passing parameters within the URL:

Payload do atacante JavaScript
window.location = examplescheme://method?parameter=value
Exemplo de código seguro

Secure pseudo

Seguro pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Lista de verificação de prevenção

How to prevent CWE-346

  • Architecture Use safe-by-default frameworks and APIs that prevent the unsafe pattern from being expressible.
  • Implementation Validate input at trust boundaries; use allowlists, not denylists.
  • Implementation Apply the principle of least privilege to credentials, file paths, and runtime permissions.
  • Testing Cover this weakness in CI: SAST rules + targeted unit tests for the data flow.
  • Operation Monitor logs for the runtime signals listed in the next section.
Sinais de deteção

How to detect CWE-346

SAST High

Executar análise estática (SAST) na base de código à procura do padrão inseguro no fluxo de dados.

DAST Moderate

Executar testes dinâmicos de segurança de aplicações (DAST) contra o endpoint em execução.

Runtime Moderate

Monitorizar os registos em tempo de execução para traços de exceção invulgares, input malformado ou tentativas de contornar a autorização.

Code review Moderate

Revisão de código: sinalizar qualquer novo código que trate input desta superfície sem usar os ajudantes validados do framework.

Correção automática do Plexicus

O Plexicus deteta automaticamente o CWE-346 e abre um PR de correção em menos de 60 segundos.

O Codex Remedium analisa cada commit, identifica esta fraqueza exata e entrega um pull request pronto para revisão com o patch. Sem tickets. Sem transferências.

Perguntas frequentes

Frequently asked questions

O que é o CWE-346?

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly confirm the true origin of incoming data or communication, allowing attackers to spoof their source.

Qual a gravidade do CWE-346?

A MITRE não publicou uma classificação de probabilidade de exploração para esta fraqueza. Trate-a como impacto médio até o seu modelo de ameaças provar o contrário.

Que linguagens ou plataformas são afetadas pelo CWE-346?

A MITRE não especificou as plataformas afetadas por este CWE — pode aplicar-se à maioria das stacks de aplicações.

Como posso prevenir o CWE-346?

Use safe-by-default frameworks, validate untrusted input at trust boundaries, and apply the principle of least privilege. Cover the data-flow signature in CI with SAST.

Como é que o Plexicus deteta e corrige o CWE-346?

O motor SAST do Plexicus correlaciona a assinatura de fluxo de dados do CWE-346 em cada commit. Quando é encontrada uma correspondência, o nosso agente Codex Remedium abre um PR de correção com o código corrigido, testes e um resumo de uma linha para o revisor.

Onde posso saber mais sobre o CWE-346?

A MITRE publica a definição canónica em https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/346.html. Pode também consultar a documentação da OWASP e do NIST para orientações adjacentes.

Fraquezas relacionadas

Weaknesses related to CWE-346

CWE-345 Pai

Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly check where data comes from or confirm its legitimacy, allowing untrusted…

CWE-1293 Irmão

Missing Source Correlation of Multiple Independent Data

This vulnerability occurs when a system trusts a single source of data without verification, making it impossible to detect if that source…

CWE-347 Irmão

Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly check the digital signature on data, or skips the verification step…

CWE-348 Irmão

Use of Less Trusted Source

This vulnerability occurs when a system has access to multiple sources for the same critical data, but it chooses to rely on the less…

CWE-349 Irmão

Acceptance of Extraneous Untrusted Data With Trusted Data

This vulnerability occurs when a system processes both trusted and untrusted data together, but fails to separate them. The application…

CWE-351 Irmão

Insufficient Type Distinction

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly differentiate between different types of data or objects, leading to…

CWE-352 Irmão

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) happens when a web application cannot reliably tell if a user actually intended to submit a request,…

CWE-353 Irmão

Missing Support for Integrity Check

This vulnerability occurs when a system uses a communication protocol that lacks built-in integrity verification, such as a checksum or…

CWE-354 Irmão

Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value

This vulnerability occurs when software fails to properly check the integrity of data by validating its checksum or hash value. Without…

Pronto quando você estiver

Pare de pagar por desenvolvedor.
Comece a fechar o ciclo.

O Plexicus é o ASPM nativo de IA que verifica, filtra, corrige, pentesta e explica — de forma autónoma. Programadores ilimitados, repos ilimitados, ações de IA de utilização justa. Nível gratuito real, €269/mo anual quando estiver pronto.