CWE-908 Base Incomplet Medium likelihood

Use of Uninitialized Resource

This vulnerability occurs when software attempts to use a resource—like memory, a file handle, or an object—before it has been properly set up or assigned a valid starting state.

Définition

What is CWE-908?

This vulnerability occurs when software attempts to use a resource—like memory, a file handle, or an object—before it has been properly set up or assigned a valid starting state.
Using an uninitialized resource is like trying to drive a car without starting the engine; the system doesn't have a valid state to operate from. This often happens due to coding oversights, such as forgetting to assign a value to a variable, failing to open a file before reading it, or not constructing an object before calling its methods. The specific resource could be anything from a block of memory and a database connection to a configuration setting or a network socket. The consequences depend entirely on what the resource is and how the program tries to use it. At best, the software might behave unpredictably or produce incorrect results. More severely, it can crash the application, expose sensitive data leftover in memory, or create a path for attackers to manipulate the program's control flow. This makes it a common root cause for stability issues and a potential gateway to more serious security exploits.
Impact réel

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-908

  • Chain: Creation of the packet client occurs before initialization is complete (CWE-696) resulting in a read from uninitialized memory (CWE-908), causing memory corruption.

  • Use of uninitialized memory may allow code execution.

  • Free of an uninitialized pointer leads to crash and possible code execution.

  • Product does not clear memory contents when generating an error message, leading to information leak.

  • Lack of initialization triggers NULL pointer dereference or double-free.

  • Uninitialized variable leads to code execution in popular desktop application.

  • Chain: Uninitialized variable leads to infinite loop.

  • Chain: Improper initialization leads to memory corruption.

Comment les attaquants l'exploitent

Parcours de l'attaquant étape par étape

  1. 1

    Here, a boolean initiailized field is consulted to ensure that initialization tasks are only completed once. However, the field is mistakenly set to true during static initialization, so the initialization code is never reached.

  2. 2

    The following code intends to limit certain operations to the administrator only.

  3. 3

    If the application is unable to extract the state information - say, due to a database timeout - then the $uid variable will not be explicitly set by the programmer. This will cause $uid to be regarded as equivalent to "0" in the conditional, allowing the original user to perform administrator actions. Even if the attacker cannot directly influence the state data, unexpected errors could cause incorrect privileges to be assigned to a user just by accident.

  4. 4

    The following code intends to concatenate a string to a variable and print the string.

  5. 5

    This might seem innocent enough, but str was not initialized, so it contains random memory. As a result, str[0] might not contain the null terminator, so the copy might start at an offset other than 0. The consequences can vary, depending on the underlying memory.

Exemple de code vulnérable

Vulnerable Java

Here, a boolean initiailized field is consulted to ensure that initialization tasks are only completed once. However, the field is mistakenly set to true during static initialization, so the initialization code is never reached.

Vulnérable Java
private boolean initialized = true;
  public void someMethod() {
  		if (!initialized) {
```
// perform initialization tasks* 
  				...
  				
  				initialized = true;}
Exemple de code sécurisé

Secure C

When the printf() is reached, test_string might be an unexpected address, so the printf might print junk strings (CWE-457). To fix this code, there are a couple approaches to making sure that test_string has been properly set once it reaches the printf(). One solution would be to set test_string to an acceptable default before the conditional:

Sécurisé C
char *test_string = "Done at the beginning";
 if (i != err_val)
 {

```
  test_string = "Hello World!";
 }
 printf("%s", test_string);
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Liste de contrôle de prévention

How to prevent CWE-908

  • Implementation Explicitly initialize the resource before use. If this is performed through an API function or standard procedure, follow all required steps.
  • Implementation Pay close attention to complex conditionals that affect initialization, since some branches might not perform the initialization.
  • Implementation Avoid race conditions (CWE-362) during initialization routines.
  • Build and Compilation Run or compile the product with settings that generate warnings about uninitialized variables or data.
Signaux de détection

How to detect CWE-908

SAST High

Exécuter une analyse statique (SAST) sur le code source à la recherche du motif non sécurisé dans le flux de données.

DAST Moderate

Exécuter des tests de sécurité applicative dynamique (DAST) contre le point de terminaison en ligne.

Runtime Moderate

Surveiller les journaux runtime pour détecter des traces d'exception inhabituelles, des entrées malformées ou des tentatives de contournement d'autorisation.

Code review Moderate

Revue de code : signaler tout nouveau code qui traite les entrées de cette surface sans utiliser les helpers du framework validés.

Correction automatique Plexicus

Plexicus détecte automatiquement CWE-908 et ouvre une PR de correction en moins de 60 secondes.

Codex Remedium analyse chaque commit, identifie cette faiblesse précise et livre une pull request prête à être relue avec le correctif. Pas de tickets. Pas de transferts.

Questions fréquentes

Frequently asked questions

Qu'est-ce que CWE-908 ?

This vulnerability occurs when software attempts to use a resource—like memory, a file handle, or an object—before it has been properly set up or assigned a valid starting state.

Quelle est la gravité de CWE-908 ?

MITRE évalue la probabilité d'exploitation comme Moyenne — l'exploitation est réaliste mais nécessite généralement des conditions spécifiques.

Quels langages ou plateformes sont affectés par CWE-908 ?

MITRE n'a pas spécifié les plateformes affectées pour ce CWE — il peut s'appliquer à la plupart des stacks applicatives.

Comment puis-je prévenir CWE-908 ?

Explicitly initialize the resource before use. If this is performed through an API function or standard procedure, follow all required steps. Pay close attention to complex conditionals that affect initialization, since some branches might not perform the initialization.

Comment Plexicus détecte et corrige CWE-908 ?

Le moteur SAST de Plexicus reconnaît la signature de flux de données de CWE-908 à chaque commit. Lorsqu'une correspondance est trouvée, notre agent Codex Remedium ouvre une PR de correction avec le code corrigé, les tests et un résumé d'une ligne pour le relecteur.

Où puis-je en savoir plus sur CWE-908 ?

MITRE publie la définition canonique à https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/908.html. Vous pouvez également consulter la documentation OWASP et NIST pour des conseils adjacents.

Faiblesses associées

Weaknesses related to CWE-908

CWE-665 Parent

Improper Initialization

This vulnerability occurs when software fails to properly set up a resource before use, or provides incorrect starting values, leaving it…

CWE-1188 Frère

Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default

This vulnerability occurs when software uses an insecure default setting or value for a resource, assuming an administrator will change it…

CWE-1279 Frère

Cryptographic Operations are run Before Supporting Units are Ready

This vulnerability occurs when cryptographic processes start before their required dependencies are properly initialized and ready to…

CWE-1419 Frère

Incorrect Initialization of Resource

This weakness occurs when a system fails to properly set up a resource during its creation, leaving it in an unstable, incorrect, or…

CWE-1434 Frère

Insecure Setting of Generative AI/ML Model Inference Parameters

This vulnerability occurs when a generative AI or ML model is deployed with inference parameters that are too permissive, causing it to…

CWE-455 Frère

Non-exit on Failed Initialization

This vulnerability occurs when software continues to run as normal after encountering a critical security failure during its startup…

CWE-456 Frère

Missing Initialization of a Variable

This vulnerability occurs when a program uses a variable before giving it a starting value, causing the software to rely on unpredictable…

CWE-457 Frère

Use of Uninitialized Variable

This vulnerability occurs when a program accesses a variable before it has been assigned a value, leading to unpredictable behavior and…

CWE-770 Frère

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

This vulnerability occurs when a system allows users or processes to request resources without any built-in caps or rate limits. Think of…

Prêt quand vous l'êtes

Arrêtez de payer par développeur.
Commencez à fermer la boucle.

Plexicus est l'ASPM natif IA qui scanne, filtre, corrige, penteste et explique — de façon autonome. Développeurs illimités, dépôts illimités, actions IA à usage équitable. Vrai niveau gratuit, €269/mo annuel quand vous êtes prêt.