Ejecuta análisis estático (SAST) sobre el código buscando el patrón inseguro en el flujo de datos.
Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification)
This vulnerability occurs when a system allows an attacker to trigger a disproportionate amount of resource consumption—like CPU, memory, or bandwidth—with minimal effort on their part. The…
What is CWE-405?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-405
-
Classic "Smurf" attack, using spoofed ICMP packets to broadcast addresses.
-
Parsing library allows XML bomb
-
Tool creates directories before authenticating user.
-
Python has "quadratic complexity" issue when converting string to int with many digits in unexpected bases
-
server allows ReDOS with crafted User-Agent strings, due to overlapping capture groups that cause excessive backtracking.
-
composite: NTP feature generates large responses (high amplification factor) with spoofed UDP source addresses.
-
Diffie-Hellman (DHE) Key Agreement Protocol allows attackers to send arbitrary numbers that are not public keys, which causes the server to perform expensive, unnecessary computation of modular exponentiation.
-
The Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Protocol allows use of long exponents, which are more computationally expensive than using certain "short exponents" with particular properties.
Ruta del atacante paso a paso
- 1
This code listens on a port for DNS requests and sends the result to the requesting address.
- 2
This code sends a DNS record to a requesting IP address. UDP allows the source IP address to be easily changed ('spoofed'), thus allowing an attacker to redirect responses to a target, which may be then be overwhelmed by the network traffic.
- 3
This function prints the contents of a specified file requested by a user.
- 4
This code first reads a specified file into memory, then prints the file if the user is authorized to see its contents. The read of the file into memory may be resource intensive and is unnecessary if the user is not allowed to see the file anyway.
- 5
The DTD and the very brief XML below illustrate what is meant by an XML bomb. The ZERO entity contains one character, the letter A. The choice of entity name ZERO is being used to indicate length equivalent to that exponent on two, that is, the length of ZERO is 2^0. Similarly, ONE refers to ZERO twice, therefore the XML parser will expand ONE to a length of 2, or 2^1. Ultimately, we reach entity THIRTYTWO, which will expand to 2^32 characters in length, or 4 GB, probably consuming far more data than expected.
Vulnerable Python
This code listens on a port for DNS requests and sends the result to the requesting address.
sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_DGRAM)
sock.bind( (UDP_IP,UDP_PORT) )
while true:
data = sock.recvfrom(1024)
if not data:
break
(requestIP, nameToResolve) = parseUDPpacket(data)
record = resolveName(nameToResolve)
sendResponse(requestIP,record) The DTD and the very brief XML below illustrate what is meant by an XML bomb. The ZERO entity contains one character, the letter A. The choice of entity name ZERO is being used to indicate length equivalent to that exponent on two, that is, the length of ZERO is 2^0. Similarly, ONE refers to ZERO twice, therefore the XML parser will expand ONE to a length of 2, or 2^1. Ultimately, we reach entity THIRTYTWO, which will expand to 2^32 characters in length, or 4 GB, probably consuming far more data than expected.
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE MaliciousDTD [
<!ENTITY ZERO "A">
<!ENTITY ONE "&ZERO;&ZERO;">
<!ENTITY TWO "&ONE;&ONE;">
...
<!ENTITY THIRTYTWO "&THIRTYONE;&THIRTYONE;">
]>
<data>&THIRTYTWO;</data> Secure JavaScript
The regular expression has a vulnerable backtracking clause inside (\w+\s?)*$ which can be triggered to cause a Denial of Service by processing particular phrases. To fix the backtracking problem, backtracking is removed with the ?= portion of the expression which changes it to a lookahead and the \2 which prevents the backtracking. The modified example is:
var test_string = "Bad characters: $@#";
var good_pattern = /^((?=(\w+))\2\s?)*$/i;
var result = test_string.search(good_pattern); How to prevent CWE-405
- Architecture and Design An application must make resources available to a client commensurate with the client's access level.
- Architecture and Design An application must, at all times, keep track of allocated resources and meter their usage appropriately.
- System Configuration Consider disabling resource-intensive algorithms on the server side, such as Diffie-Hellman key exchange.
How to detect CWE-405
Ejecuta pruebas dinámicas de seguridad de aplicaciones (DAST) contra el endpoint en vivo.
Vigila los logs en tiempo de ejecución para detectar trazas de excepción inusuales, entradas malformadas o intentos de bypass de autorización.
Revisión de código: marca cualquier código nuevo que maneje entrada desde esta superficie sin usar los helpers validados del framework.
Plexicus detecta automáticamente CWE-405 y abre un PR de corrección en menos de 60 segundos.
Codex Remedium escanea cada commit, identifica esta debilidad concreta y entrega un pull request listo para revisión con el parche. Sin tickets. Sin traspasos.
Frequently asked questions
¿Qué es CWE-405?
This vulnerability occurs when a system allows an attacker to trigger a disproportionate amount of resource consumption—like CPU, memory, or bandwidth—with minimal effort on their part. The attacker's small input causes a large, inefficient output, creating an unfair 'asymmetric' advantage.
¿Qué gravedad tiene CWE-405?
MITRE no ha publicado una calificación de probabilidad de explotación para esta debilidad. Trátala como de impacto medio hasta que tu modelo de amenazas demuestre lo contrario.
¿Qué lenguajes o plataformas se ven afectados por CWE-405?
MITRE lists the following affected platforms: Not OS-Specific, Not Architecture-Specific, Not Technology-Specific, Client Server.
¿Cómo puedo prevenir CWE-405?
An application must make resources available to a client commensurate with the client's access level. An application must, at all times, keep track of allocated resources and meter their usage appropriately.
¿Cómo detecta y corrige Plexicus CWE-405?
El motor SAST de Plexicus detecta la firma de flujo de datos para CWE-405 en cada commit. Cuando hay coincidencia, nuestro agente Codex Remedium abre un PR de corrección con el código corregido, las pruebas y un resumen de una línea para el revisor.
¿Dónde puedo aprender más sobre CWE-405?
MITRE publica la definición canónica en https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/405.html. También puedes consultar la documentación de OWASP y NIST para guías relacionadas.
Weaknesses related to CWE-405
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly manage a finite resource, allowing an attacker to exhaust it and cause a…
Incorrect Use of Autoboxing and Unboxing for Performance Critical Operations
This weakness occurs when a program relies on automatic boxing and unboxing of primitive types within performance-sensitive code sections,…
Improper Write Handling in Limited-write Non-Volatile Memories
This vulnerability occurs when a system fails to properly manage write operations on memory hardware that has a limited lifespan, such as…
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
This vulnerability occurs when a system allows users or processes to request resources without any built-in caps or rate limits. Think of…
Missing Reference to Active Allocated Resource
This vulnerability occurs when software loses track of a resource it has allocated, like memory or a file handle, preventing the system…
Logging of Excessive Data
This vulnerability occurs when an application records more information than necessary in its logs, making log files difficult to analyze…
Improper Restriction of Power Consumption
This vulnerability occurs when software running on a power-constrained device, like a battery-powered mobile or embedded system, fails to…
Excessive Platform Resource Consumption within a Loop
This vulnerability occurs when a loop contains code that repeatedly consumes critical system resources like file handles, database…
Data Resource Access without Use of Connection Pooling
This weakness occurs when an application creates a new database connection for every request instead of using a managed connection pool.…
Deja de pagar por desarrollador.
Empieza a cerrar el bucle.
Plexicus es el ASPM nativo de IA que escanea, filtra, corrige, pentestea y explica — de forma autónoma. Desarrolladores ilimitados, repos ilimitados, acciones de IA de uso justo. Nivel gratuito real, €269/mo anual cuando estés listo.