Ejecuta análisis estático (SAST) sobre el código buscando el patrón inseguro en el flujo de datos.
Insufficient Psychological Acceptability
This weakness occurs when security features are so cumbersome or confusing that well-intentioned users feel forced to turn them off or find workarounds, defeating their purpose entirely.
What is CWE-655?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-655
Todavía no hay CVEs públicos enlazados a esta CWE en el catálogo de MITRE.
Ruta del atacante paso a paso
- 1
In "Usability of Security: A Case Study" [REF-540], the authors consider human factors in a cryptography product. Some of the weakness relevant discoveries of this case study were: users accidentally leaked sensitive information, could not figure out how to perform some tasks, thought they were enabling a security option when they were not, and made improper trust decisions.
- 2
Enforcing complex and difficult-to-remember passwords that need to be frequently changed for access to trivial resources, e.g., to use a black-and-white printer. Complex password requirements can also cause users to store the passwords in an unsafe manner so they don't have to remember them, such as using a sticky note or saving them in an unencrypted file.
- 3
Some CAPTCHA utilities produce images that are too difficult for a human to read, causing user frustration.
Vulnerable pseudo
MITRE no ha publicado un ejemplo de código para esta CWE. El patrón siguiente es ilustrativo — consulta Recursos para referencias canónicas.
// Example pattern — see MITRE for the canonical references.
function handleRequest(input) {
// Untrusted input flows directly into the sensitive sink.
return executeUnsafe(input);
} Secure pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
return executeWithGuards(safe);
} How to prevent CWE-655
- Testing Where possible, perform human factors and usability studies to identify where your product's security mechanisms are difficult to use, and why.
- Architecture and Design Make the security mechanism as seamless as possible, while also providing the user with sufficient details when a security decision produces unexpected results.
How to detect CWE-655
Ejecuta pruebas dinámicas de seguridad de aplicaciones (DAST) contra el endpoint en vivo.
Vigila los logs en tiempo de ejecución para detectar trazas de excepción inusuales, entradas malformadas o intentos de bypass de autorización.
Revisión de código: marca cualquier código nuevo que maneje entrada desde esta superficie sin usar los helpers validados del framework.
Plexicus detecta automáticamente CWE-655 y abre un PR de corrección en menos de 60 segundos.
Codex Remedium escanea cada commit, identifica esta debilidad concreta y entrega un pull request listo para revisión con el parche. Sin tickets. Sin traspasos.
Frequently asked questions
¿Qué es CWE-655?
This weakness occurs when security features are so cumbersome or confusing that well-intentioned users feel forced to turn them off or find workarounds, defeating their purpose entirely.
¿Qué gravedad tiene CWE-655?
MITRE no ha publicado una calificación de probabilidad de explotación para esta debilidad. Trátala como de impacto medio hasta que tu modelo de amenazas demuestre lo contrario.
¿Qué lenguajes o plataformas se ven afectados por CWE-655?
MITRE no ha especificado plataformas afectadas para esta CWE — puede aplicar a la mayoría de los stacks de aplicaciones.
¿Cómo puedo prevenir CWE-655?
Where possible, perform human factors and usability studies to identify where your product's security mechanisms are difficult to use, and why. Make the security mechanism as seamless as possible, while also providing the user with sufficient details when a security decision produces unexpected results.
¿Cómo detecta y corrige Plexicus CWE-655?
El motor SAST de Plexicus detecta la firma de flujo de datos para CWE-655 en cada commit. Cuando hay coincidencia, nuestro agente Codex Remedium abre un PR de corrección con el código corregido, las pruebas y un resumen de una línea para el revisor.
¿Dónde puedo aprender más sobre CWE-655?
MITRE publica la definición canónica en https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/655.html. También puedes consultar la documentación de OWASP y NIST para guías relacionadas.
Weaknesses related to CWE-655
Violation of Secure Design Principles
This weakness occurs when a system's architecture or design fails to follow fundamental security principles, creating a flawed foundation…
Improper Identifier for IP Block used in System-On-Chip (SOC)
This weakness occurs when a System-on-Chip (SoC) lacks a secure, unique, and permanent identifier for its internal hardware components (IP…
Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component
This vulnerability occurs when your software relies on an external library, framework, or module that contains known security flaws.
Execution with Unnecessary Privileges
This vulnerability occurs when software runs with higher permissions than it actually needs to perform its tasks. This excessive privilege…
Not Failing Securely ('Failing Open')
This vulnerability occurs when a system, upon encountering an error or failure, defaults to its least secure configuration instead of a…
Unnecessary Complexity in Protection Mechanism (Not Using 'Economy of Mechanism')
This weakness occurs when a security feature is implemented with excessive complexity, creating unnecessary risk. Overly intricate…
Not Using Complete Mediation
This vulnerability occurs when software fails to verify access permissions every single time a user or process tries to use a resource.…
Improper Isolation or Compartmentalization
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to enforce strong boundaries between components that operate at different security…
Reliance on a Single Factor in a Security Decision
This vulnerability occurs when a system's security check depends almost entirely on just one condition, object, or piece of data to decide…
Further reading
- MITRE — CWE-655 oficial https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/655.html
- The Protection of Information in Computer Systems http://web.mit.edu/Saltzer/www/publications/protection/
- Psychological Acceptability https://web.archive.org/web/20221104163022/https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/bsi/articles/knowledge/principles/psychological-acceptability
- Usability of Security: A Case Study http://reports-archive.adm.cs.cmu.edu/anon/1998/CMU-CS-98-155.pdf
Deja de pagar por desarrollador.
Empieza a cerrar el bucle.
Plexicus es el ASPM nativo de IA que escanea, filtra, corrige, pentestea y explica — de forma autónoma. Desarrolladores ilimitados, repos ilimitados, acciones de IA de uso justo. Nivel gratuito real, €269/mo anual cuando estés listo.