CWE-798 Base Borrador High likelihood

Use of Hard-coded Credentials

This vulnerability occurs when software contains built-in, unchangeable authentication secrets like passwords or encryption keys within its source code or configuration files.

Definición

What is CWE-798?

This vulnerability occurs when software contains built-in, unchangeable authentication secrets like passwords or encryption keys within its source code or configuration files.
This flaw typically manifests in two primary scenarios. The first, often called 'inbound authentication,' involves the software checking user logins against a fixed, default set of credentials—like a universal admin account with a simple, embedded password that's identical across every installation. This password usually cannot be changed or disabled through normal administrative controls, requiring a code patch instead, and it can be extremely difficult for system owners to even detect its presence. The second scenario, 'outbound authentication,' happens when an application (like a front-end service) needs to connect to another system (like a back-end database) and has the connection credentials permanently written into its code. Developers might hard-code these backend passwords for convenience, but this makes them easily discoverable by anyone who can access the application's code or binaries, exposing the connected system to unauthorized access.
Vulnerability Diagram CWE-798
Hard-coded Credentials app.js (committed) const DB = { user: "admin", pass: "S3cretP@ss" }; db.connect(DB); Repo / artifact leak git history, npm tarball, docker image, mobile APK → same creds everywhere all customers compromised A leaked repo or binary exposes a credential reused across all installs.
Impacto en el mundo real

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-798

  • CVE-2022-29953

    Condition Monitor firmware has a maintenance interface with hard-coded credentials

  • CVE-2022-29960

    Engineering Workstation uses hard-coded cryptographic keys that could allow for unathorized filesystem access and privilege escalation

  • CVE-2022-29964

    Distributed Control System (DCS) has hard-coded passwords for local shell access

  • CVE-2022-30997

    Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) has a maintenance service that uses undocumented, hard-coded credentials

  • CVE-2022-30314

    Firmware for a Safety Instrumented System (SIS) has hard-coded credentials for access to boot configuration

  • CVE-2022-30271

    Remote Terminal Unit (RTU) uses a hard-coded SSH private key that is likely to be used in typical deployments

  • CVE-2021-37555

    Telnet service for IoT feeder for dogs and cats has hard-coded password [REF-1288]

  • CVE-2021-35033

    Firmware for a WiFi router uses a hard-coded password for a BusyBox shell, allowing bypass of authentication through the UART port

Cómo lo explotan los atacantes

Ruta del atacante paso a paso

  1. 1

    The following code uses a hard-coded password to connect to a database:

  2. 2

    This is an example of an external hard-coded password on the client-side of a connection. This code will run successfully, but anyone who has access to it will have access to the password. Once the program has shipped, there is no going back from the database user "scott" with a password of "tiger" unless the program is patched. A devious employee with access to this information can use it to break into the system. Even worse, if attackers have access to the bytecode for application, they can use the javap -c command to access the disassembled code, which will contain the values of the passwords used. The result of this operation might look something like the following for the example above:

  3. 3

    The following code is an example of an internal hard-coded password in the back-end:

  4. 4

    Every instance of this program can be placed into diagnostic mode with the same password. Even worse is the fact that if this program is distributed as a binary-only distribution, it is very difficult to change that password or disable this "functionality."

  5. 5

    The following code examples attempt to verify a password using a hard-coded cryptographic key.

Ejemplo de código vulnerable

Vulnerable Java

The following code uses a hard-coded password to connect to a database:

Vulnerable Java 
...
  DriverManager.getConnection(url, "scott", "tiger");
  ...
Payload del atacante

This is an example of an external hard-coded password on the client-side of a connection. This code will run successfully, but anyone who has access to it will have access to the password. Once the program has shipped, there is no going back from the database user "scott" with a password of "tiger" unless the program is patched. A devious employee with access to this information can use it to break into the system. Even worse, if attackers have access to the bytecode for application, they can use the javap -c command to access the disassembled code, which will contain the values of the passwords used. The result of this operation might look something like the following for the example above:

Payload del atacante 
javap -c ConnMngr.class
  	22: ldc #36; //String jdbc:mysql://ixne.com/rxsql
  	24: ldc #38; //String scott
  	26: ldc #17; //String tiger
Ejemplo de código seguro

Secure pseudo

Seguro pseudo 
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Lista de prevención

How to prevent CWE-798

  • Architecture and Design For outbound authentication: store passwords, keys, and other credentials outside of the code in a strongly-protected, encrypted configuration file or database that is protected from access by all outsiders, including other local users on the same system. Properly protect the key (CWE-320). If you cannot use encryption to protect the file, then make sure that the permissions are as restrictive as possible [REF-7]. In Windows environments, the Encrypted File System (EFS) may provide some protection.
  • Architecture and Design For inbound authentication: Rather than hard-code a default username and password, key, or other authentication credentials for first time logins, utilize a "first login" mode that requires the user to enter a unique strong password or key.
  • Architecture and Design If the product must contain hard-coded credentials or they cannot be removed, perform access control checks and limit which entities can access the feature that requires the hard-coded credentials. For example, a feature might only be enabled through the system console instead of through a network connection.
  • Architecture and Design For inbound authentication using passwords: apply strong one-way hashes to passwords and store those hashes in a configuration file or database with appropriate access control. That way, theft of the file/database still requires the attacker to try to crack the password. When handling an incoming password during authentication, take the hash of the password and compare it to the saved hash. Use randomly assigned salts for each separate hash that is generated. This increases the amount of computation that an attacker needs to conduct a brute-force attack, possibly limiting the effectiveness of the rainbow table method.
  • Architecture and Design For front-end to back-end connections: Three solutions are possible, although none are complete. - The first suggestion involves the use of generated passwords or keys that are changed automatically and must be entered at given time intervals by a system administrator. These passwords will be held in memory and only be valid for the time intervals. - Next, the passwords or keys should be limited at the back end to only performing actions valid for the front end, as opposed to having full access. - Finally, the messages sent should be tagged and checksummed with time sensitive values so as to prevent replay-style attacks.
Señales de detección

How to detect CWE-798

Black Box Moderate

Credential storage in configuration files is findable using black box methods, but the use of hard-coded credentials for an incoming authentication routine typically involves an account that is not visible outside of the code.

Automated Static Analysis

Automated white box techniques have been published for detecting hard-coded credentials for incoming authentication, but there is some expert disagreement regarding their effectiveness and applicability to a broad range of methods.

Manual Static Analysis

This weakness may be detectable using manual code analysis. Unless authentication is decentralized and applied throughout the product, there can be sufficient time for the analyst to find incoming authentication routines and examine the program logic looking for usage of hard-coded credentials. Configuration files could also be analyzed.

Manual Dynamic Analysis

For hard-coded credentials in incoming authentication: use monitoring tools that examine the product's process as it interacts with the operating system and the network. This technique is useful in cases when source code is unavailable, if the product was not developed by you, or if you want to verify that the build phase did not introduce any new weaknesses. Examples include debuggers that directly attach to the running process; system-call tracing utilities such as truss (Solaris) and strace (Linux); system activity monitors such as FileMon, RegMon, Process Monitor, and other Sysinternals utilities (Windows); and sniffers and protocol analyzers that monitor network traffic. Attach the monitor to the process and perform a login. Using call trees or similar artifacts from the output, examine the associated behaviors and see if any of them appear to be comparing the input to a fixed string or value.

Automated Static Analysis - Binary or Bytecode SOAR Partial

According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful: ``` Cost effective for partial coverage: ``` Bytecode Weakness Analysis - including disassembler + source code weakness analysis Binary Weakness Analysis - including disassembler + source code weakness analysis

Manual Static Analysis - Binary or Bytecode High

According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful: ``` Highly cost effective: ``` Binary / Bytecode disassembler - then use manual analysis for vulnerabilities & anomalies

Auto-corrección de Plexicus

Plexicus detecta automáticamente CWE-798 y abre un PR de corrección en menos de 60 segundos.

Codex Remedium escanea cada commit, identifica esta debilidad concreta y entrega un pull request listo para revisión con el parche. Sin tickets. Sin traspasos.

Solicitar demo Probar Plexicus gratis
Preguntas frecuentes

Frequently asked questions

¿Qué es CWE-798?

This vulnerability occurs when software contains built-in, unchangeable authentication secrets like passwords or encryption keys within its source code or configuration files.

¿Qué gravedad tiene CWE-798?

MITRE califica la probabilidad de explotación como Alta — esta debilidad se explota activamente en la práctica y debe priorizarse para su remediación.

¿Qué lenguajes o plataformas se ven afectados por CWE-798?

MITRE lists the following affected platforms: Mobile, ICS/OT.

¿Cómo puedo prevenir CWE-798?

For outbound authentication: store passwords, keys, and other credentials outside of the code in a strongly-protected, encrypted configuration file or database that is protected from access by all outsiders, including other local users on the same system. Properly protect the key (CWE-320). If you cannot use encryption to protect the file, then make sure that the permissions are as restrictive as possible [REF-7]. In Windows environments, the Encrypted File System (EFS) may provide some…

¿Cómo detecta y corrige Plexicus CWE-798?

El motor SAST de Plexicus detecta la firma de flujo de datos para CWE-798 en cada commit. Cuando hay coincidencia, nuestro agente Codex Remedium abre un PR de corrección con el código corregido, las pruebas y un resumen de una línea para el revisor.

¿Dónde puedo aprender más sobre CWE-798?

MITRE publica la definición canónica en https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html. También puedes consultar la documentación de OWASP y NIST para guías relacionadas.

Debilidades relacionadas

Weaknesses related to CWE-798

CWE-1391 Padre

Use of Weak Credentials

This vulnerability occurs when a system relies on weak authentication credentials—like default passwords, hard-coded keys, or easily…

CWE-1392 Hermano

Use of Default Credentials

This vulnerability occurs when a system, device, or application relies on pre-configured, publicly known credentials like passwords or…

CWE-521 Hermano

Weak Password Requirements

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to enforce strong password policies, making user accounts easier to compromise through…

CWE-257 Par

Storing Passwords in a Recoverable Format

This vulnerability occurs when an application stores user passwords in a format that can be easily reversed or decrypted back to their…

CWE-259 Hijo

Use of Hard-coded Password

This vulnerability occurs when an application embeds a password directly into its source code or configuration files. This hard-coded…

CWE-321 Hijo

Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key

This vulnerability occurs when an application embeds a fixed, unchangeable cryptographic key directly within its source code or…

Recursos

Further reading

Listo cuando tú lo estés

Deja de pagar por desarrollador.
Empieza a cerrar el bucle.

Plexicus es el ASPM nativo de IA que escanea, filtra, corrige, pentestea y explica — de forma autónoma. Desarrolladores ilimitados, repos ilimitados, acciones de IA de uso justo. Nivel gratuito real, €269/mo anual cuando estés listo.

Comenzar gratis Reservar una demo