CWE-1270 Base Incompleto

Generation of Incorrect Security Tokens

This vulnerability occurs when a system's security token mechanism, designed to control permissions for different entities or agents, generates tokens that are fundamentally flawed or incorrect.

Definición

What is CWE-1270?

This vulnerability occurs when a system's security token mechanism, designed to control permissions for different entities or agents, generates tokens that are fundamentally flawed or incorrect.
In Systems-on-a-Chip (SoC) and similar hardware, security tokens act as digital IDs that define what actions (like read, write, or reset) each hardware agent is allowed to perform. These tokens are assigned based on an agent's trust level. If the token generation logic is broken, it can assign duplicate tokens to multiple agents or assign multiple conflicting tokens to a single agent. This flawed assignment breaks the fundamental security model. It can lead to severe consequences, including system crashes (Denial-of-Service), privilege escalation where a low-trust agent gains high-level access, or unauthorized actions that compromise the entire chip's security and data integrity.
Impacto en el mundo real

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-1270

Todavía no hay CVEs públicos enlazados a esta CWE en el catálogo de MITRE.

Cómo lo explotan los atacantes

Ruta del atacante paso a paso

  1. 1

    Consider a system with a register for storing an AES key for encryption or decryption. The key is 128 bits long implemented as a set of four 32-bit registers. The key registers are assets, and register, AES_KEY_ACCESS_POLICY, is defined to provide necessary access controls. The access-policy register defines which agents, using a Security Token, may access the AES-key registers. Each bit in this 32-bit register is used to define a Security Token. There could be a maximum of 32 Security Tokens that are allowed access to the AES-key registers. When set (bit = "1") bit number allows action from an agent whose identity matches that bit number. If Clear (bit = "0") the action is disallowed for the corresponding agent.

  2. 2

    Assume the system has two agents: a Main-controller and an Aux-controller. The respective Security Tokens are "1" and "2". | Register | Description | Default | | --- | --- | --- | | AES_ENC_DEC_KEY_0 | AES key [0:31] for encryption or decryption | 0x00000000 | | AES_ENC_DEC_KEY_1 | AES key [32:63] for encryption or decryption | 0x00000000 | | AES_ENC_DEC_KEY_2 | AES key [64:95] for encryption or decryption | 0x00000000 | | AES_ENC_DEC_KEY_3 | AES key [96:127] for encryption or decryption | 0x00000000 | | AES_KEY_ACCESS_POLICY | AES key access register [31:0] | 0x00000002 |

  3. 3

    An agent with a Security Token "1" has access to AES_ENC_DEC_KEY_0 through AES_ENC_DEC_KEY_3 registers. As per the above access policy, the AES-Key-access policy allows access to the AES-key registers if the security Token is "1".

  4. 4

    Both agents have access to the AES-key registers.

Ejemplo de código vulnerable

Vulnerable Other

An agent with a Security Token "1" has access to AES_ENC_DEC_KEY_0 through AES_ENC_DEC_KEY_3 registers. As per the above access policy, the AES-Key-access policy allows access to the AES-key registers if the security Token is "1".

Vulnerable Other 
The SoC incorrectly generates Security Token "1" for every agent. In other words, both Main-controller and Aux-controller are assigned Security Token "1".
Ejemplo de código seguro

Secure Other

Both agents have access to the AES-key registers.

Seguro Other 
The SoC should correctly generate Security Tokens, assigning "1" to the Main-controller and "2" to the Aux-controller
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Lista de prevención

How to prevent CWE-1270

  • Architecture and Design / Implementation - Generation of Security Tokens should be reviewed for design inconsistency and common weaknesses. - Security-Token definition and programming flow should be tested in pre-silicon and post-silicon testing.
Señales de detección

How to detect CWE-1270

SAST High

Ejecuta análisis estático (SAST) sobre el código buscando el patrón inseguro en el flujo de datos.

DAST Moderate

Ejecuta pruebas dinámicas de seguridad de aplicaciones (DAST) contra el endpoint en vivo.

Runtime Moderate

Vigila los logs en tiempo de ejecución para detectar trazas de excepción inusuales, entradas malformadas o intentos de bypass de autorización.

Code review Moderate

Revisión de código: marca cualquier código nuevo que maneje entrada desde esta superficie sin usar los helpers validados del framework.

Auto-corrección de Plexicus

Plexicus detecta automáticamente CWE-1270 y abre un PR de corrección en menos de 60 segundos.

Codex Remedium escanea cada commit, identifica esta debilidad concreta y entrega un pull request listo para revisión con el parche. Sin tickets. Sin traspasos.

Solicitar demo Probar Plexicus gratis
Preguntas frecuentes

Frequently asked questions

¿Qué es CWE-1270?

This vulnerability occurs when a system's security token mechanism, designed to control permissions for different entities or agents, generates tokens that are fundamentally flawed or incorrect.

¿Qué gravedad tiene CWE-1270?

MITRE no ha publicado una calificación de probabilidad de explotación para esta debilidad. Trátala como de impacto medio hasta que tu modelo de amenazas demuestre lo contrario.

¿Qué lenguajes o plataformas se ven afectados por CWE-1270?

MITRE lists the following affected platforms: Not OS-Specific, Not Architecture-Specific, Not Technology-Specific.

¿Cómo puedo prevenir CWE-1270?

- Generation of Security Tokens should be reviewed for design inconsistency and common weaknesses. - Security-Token definition and programming flow should be tested in pre-silicon and post-silicon testing.

¿Cómo detecta y corrige Plexicus CWE-1270?

El motor SAST de Plexicus detecta la firma de flujo de datos para CWE-1270 en cada commit. Cuando hay coincidencia, nuestro agente Codex Remedium abre un PR de corrección con el código corregido, las pruebas y un resumen de una línea para el revisor.

¿Dónde puedo aprender más sobre CWE-1270?

MITRE publica la definición canónica en https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1270.html. También puedes consultar la documentación de OWASP y NIST para guías relacionadas.

Debilidades relacionadas

Weaknesses related to CWE-1270

CWE-284 Padre

Improper Access Control

The software fails to properly limit who can access a resource, allowing unauthorized users or systems to interact with it.

CWE-1191 Hermano

On-Chip Debug and Test Interface With Improper Access Control

This vulnerability occurs when a hardware chip's debug or test interface (like JTAG) lacks proper access controls. Without correct…

CWE-1220 Hermano

Insufficient Granularity of Access Control

This vulnerability occurs when a system's access controls are too broad, allowing unauthorized users or processes to read or modify…

CWE-1224 Hermano

Improper Restriction of Write-Once Bit Fields

This vulnerability occurs when hardware write-once protection mechanisms, often called 'sticky bits,' are incorrectly implemented,…

CWE-1231 Hermano

Improper Prevention of Lock Bit Modification

This vulnerability occurs when hardware or firmware uses a lock bit to protect critical system registers or memory regions, but fails to…

CWE-1233 Hermano

Security-Sensitive Hardware Controls with Missing Lock Bit Protection

This vulnerability occurs when a hardware device uses a lock bit to protect critical configuration registers, but the lock fails to…

CWE-1252 Hermano

CPU Hardware Not Configured to Support Exclusivity of Write and Execute Operations

This vulnerability occurs when a CPU's hardware is not set up to enforce a strict separation between writing data to memory and executing…

CWE-1257 Hermano

Improper Access Control Applied to Mirrored or Aliased Memory Regions

This vulnerability occurs when a hardware design maps the same physical memory to multiple addresses (aliasing or mirroring) but fails to…

CWE-1259 Hermano

Improper Restriction of Security Token Assignment

This vulnerability occurs when a System-on-a-Chip (SoC) fails to properly secure its Security Token mechanism. These tokens control which…

Recursos

Further reading

Listo cuando tú lo estés

Deja de pagar por desarrollador.
Empieza a cerrar el bucle.

Plexicus es el ASPM nativo de IA que escanea, filtra, corrige, pentestea y explica — de forma autónoma. Desarrolladores ilimitados, repos ilimitados, acciones de IA de uso justo. Nivel gratuito real, €269/mo anual cuando estés listo.

Comenzar gratis Reservar una demo