The characterizaton of sensitive data often requires domain-specific understanding, so manual methods are useful. However, manual efforts might not achieve desired code coverage within limited time constraints. Black box methods may produce artifacts (e.g. stored data or unencrypted network transfer) that require manual evaluation.
Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data
This vulnerability occurs when an application stores or sends sensitive information without first encrypting it, leaving the data exposed.
What is CWE-311?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-311
-
password and username stored in cleartext in a cookie
-
password stored in cleartext in a file with insecure permissions
-
chat program disables SSL in some circumstances even when the user says to use SSL.
-
Chain: product uses an incorrect public exponent when generating an RSA key, which effectively disables the encryption
-
storage of unencrypted passwords in a database
-
storage of unencrypted passwords in a database
-
product stores a password in cleartext in memory
-
storage of a secret key in cleartext in a temporary file
Ruta del atacante paso a paso
- 1
This code writes a user's login information to a cookie so the user does not have to login again later.
- 2
The code stores the user's username and password in plaintext in a cookie on the user's machine. This exposes the user's login information if their computer is compromised by an attacker. Even if the user's machine is not compromised, this weakness combined with cross-site scripting (CWE-79) could allow an attacker to remotely copy the cookie.
- 3
Also note this example code also exhibits Plaintext Storage in a Cookie (CWE-315).
- 4
The following code attempts to establish a connection, read in a password, then store it to a buffer.
- 5
While successful, the program does not encrypt the data before writing it to a buffer, possibly exposing it to unauthorized actors.
Vulnerable PHP
This code writes a user's login information to a cookie so the user does not have to login again later.
function persistLogin($username, $password){
$data = array("username" => $username, "password"=> $password);
setcookie ("userdata", $data);
} Secure pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
return executeWithGuards(safe);
} How to prevent CWE-311
- Requirements Clearly specify which data or resources are valuable enough that they should be protected by encryption. Require that any transmission or storage of this data/resource should use well-vetted encryption algorithms.
- Architecture and Design Ensure that encryption is properly integrated into the system design, including but not necessarily limited to: - Encryption that is needed to store or transmit private data of the users of the system - Encryption that is needed to protect the system itself from unauthorized disclosure or tampering Identify the separate needs and contexts for encryption: - One-way (i.e., only the user or recipient needs to have the key). This can be achieved using public key cryptography, or other techniques in which the encrypting party (i.e., the product) does not need to have access to a private key. - Two-way (i.e., the encryption can be automatically performed on behalf of a user, but the key must be available so that the plaintext can be automatically recoverable by that user). This requires storage of the private key in a format that is recoverable only by the user (or perhaps by the operating system) in a way that cannot be recovered by others. Using threat modeling or other techniques, assume that data can be compromised through a separate vulnerability or weakness, and determine where encryption will be most effective. Ensure that data that should be private is not being inadvertently exposed using weaknesses such as insecure permissions (CWE-732). [REF-7]
- Architecture and Design When there is a need to store or transmit sensitive data, use strong, up-to-date cryptographic algorithms to encrypt that data. Select a well-vetted algorithm that is currently considered to be strong by experts in the field, and use well-tested implementations. As with all cryptographic mechanisms, the source code should be available for analysis. For example, US government systems require FIPS 140-2 certification. Do not develop custom or private cryptographic algorithms. They will likely be exposed to attacks that are well-understood by cryptographers. Reverse engineering techniques are mature. If the algorithm can be compromised if attackers find out how it works, then it is especially weak. Periodically ensure that the cryptography has not become obsolete. Some older algorithms, once thought to require a billion years of computing time, can now be broken in days or hours. This includes MD4, MD5, SHA1, DES, and other algorithms that were once regarded as strong. [REF-267]
- Architecture and Design Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
- Implementation / Architecture and Design When using industry-approved techniques, use them correctly. Don't cut corners by skipping resource-intensive steps (CWE-325). These steps are often essential for preventing common attacks.
- Implementation Use naming conventions and strong types to make it easier to spot when sensitive data is being used. When creating structures, objects, or other complex entities, separate the sensitive and non-sensitive data as much as possible.
How to detect CWE-311
Automated measurement of the entropy of an input/output source may indicate the use or lack of encryption, but human analysis is still required to distinguish intentionally-unencrypted data (e.g. metadata) from sensitive data.
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful: ``` Cost effective for partial coverage: ``` Binary / Bytecode disassembler - then use manual analysis for vulnerabilities & anomalies
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful: ``` Cost effective for partial coverage: ``` Web Application Scanner Web Services Scanner Database Scanners
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful: ``` Highly cost effective: ``` Network Sniffer ``` Cost effective for partial coverage: ``` Fuzz Tester Framework-based Fuzzer Automated Monitored Execution Man-in-the-middle attack tool
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful: ``` Highly cost effective: ``` Focused Manual Spotcheck - Focused manual analysis of source Manual Source Code Review (not inspections)
Plexicus detecta automáticamente CWE-311 y abre un PR de corrección en menos de 60 segundos.
Codex Remedium escanea cada commit, identifica esta debilidad concreta y entrega un pull request listo para revisión con el parche. Sin tickets. Sin traspasos.
Frequently asked questions
¿Qué es CWE-311?
This vulnerability occurs when an application stores or sends sensitive information without first encrypting it, leaving the data exposed.
¿Qué gravedad tiene CWE-311?
MITRE califica la probabilidad de explotación como Alta — esta debilidad se explota activamente en la práctica y debe priorizarse para su remediación.
¿Qué lenguajes o plataformas se ven afectados por CWE-311?
MITRE no ha especificado plataformas afectadas para esta CWE — puede aplicar a la mayoría de los stacks de aplicaciones.
¿Cómo puedo prevenir CWE-311?
Clearly specify which data or resources are valuable enough that they should be protected by encryption. Require that any transmission or storage of this data/resource should use well-vetted encryption algorithms. Ensure that encryption is properly integrated into the system design, including but not necessarily limited to: - Encryption that is needed to store or transmit private data of the users of the system - Encryption that is needed to protect the system itself from unauthorized…
¿Cómo detecta y corrige Plexicus CWE-311?
El motor SAST de Plexicus detecta la firma de flujo de datos para CWE-311 en cada commit. Cuando hay coincidencia, nuestro agente Codex Remedium abre un PR de corrección con el código corregido, las pruebas y un resumen de una línea para el revisor.
¿Dónde puedo aprender más sobre CWE-311?
MITRE publica la definición canónica en https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/311.html. También puedes consultar la documentación de OWASP y NIST para guías relacionadas.
Weaknesses related to CWE-311
Protection Mechanism Failure
This weakness occurs when software either lacks a necessary security control, implements one that is too weak, or fails to activate an…
Inadequate Detection or Handling of Adversarial Input Perturbations in Automated Recognition Mechanism
This vulnerability occurs when a system uses automated AI or machine learning to classify complex inputs like images, audio, or text, but…
Semiconductor Defects in Hardware Logic with Security-Sensitive Implications
A security-critical hardware component contains physical flaws in its semiconductor material, which can cause it to malfunction and…
Incorrect Selection of Fuse Values
This vulnerability occurs when a hardware security fuse is incorrectly programmed to represent a 'secure' state as logic 0 (unblown). An…
Product Released in Non-Release Configuration
This vulnerability occurs when a product ships to customers while still configured with its pre-production or manufacturing settings,…
Missing Protection Against Hardware Reverse Engineering Using Integrated Circuit (IC) Imaging Techniques
This vulnerability occurs when hardware lacks safeguards against physical inspection, allowing attackers to extract sensitive data by…
Public Key Re-Use for Signing both Debug and Production Code
This vulnerability occurs when the same cryptographic key is used to sign both development/debug software builds and final production…
Missing Support for Security Features in On-chip Fabrics or Buses
This vulnerability occurs when the communication channels (fabrics or buses) within a chip lack built-in or enabled security features,…
Improper Protection against Electromagnetic Fault Injection (EM-FI)
This vulnerability occurs when a hardware device lacks sufficient shielding against electromagnetic interference, allowing attackers to…
Further reading
- MITRE — CWE-311 oficial https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/311.html
- The CLASP Application Security Process https://cwe.mitre.org/documents/sources/TheCLASPApplicationSecurityProcess.pdf
- Writing Secure Code https://www.microsoftpressstore.com/store/writing-secure-code-9780735617223
- Top 25 Series - Rank 10 - Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data https://www.sans.org/blog/top-25-series-rank-10-missing-encryption-of-sensitive-data/
- FIPS PUB 140-2: SECURITY REQUIREMENTS FOR CRYPTOGRAPHIC MODULES https://csrc.nist.gov/files/pubs/fips/140-2/upd2/final/docs/fips1402.pdf
Deja de pagar por desarrollador.
Empieza a cerrar el bucle.
Plexicus es el ASPM nativo de IA que escanea, filtra, corrige, pentestea y explica — de forma autónoma. Desarrolladores ilimitados, repos ilimitados, acciones de IA de uso justo. Nivel gratuito real, €269/mo anual cuando estés listo.