CWE-397 Base Borrador

Declaration of Throws for Generic Exception

This vulnerability occurs when a method is declared to throw an overly broad exception type, such as a generic 'Exception' or 'Throwable'. This practice masks the specific error conditions that can…

Definición

What is CWE-397?

This vulnerability occurs when a method is declared to throw an overly broad exception type, such as a generic 'Exception' or 'Throwable'. This practice masks the specific error conditions that can occur, making it difficult for calling code to handle failures appropriately.
Declaring a method to throw a generic exception like `Exception` forces callers into generic error handling. Instead of being able to anticipate and write specific recovery code for different failure scenarios—like `FileNotFoundException` versus `AccessDeniedException`—developers are left with a catch-all block. This obscures the root cause, often leading to inappropriate user responses and making debugging significantly harder. Catching these overly broad declarations manually is tedious, especially in large codebases. While SAST tools can flag the pattern, Plexicus uses AI to not only detect the issue but also suggest the precise, narrower exception types to declare, automating the remediation and saving valuable development time.
Impacto en el mundo real

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-397

Todavía no hay CVEs públicos enlazados a esta CWE en el catálogo de MITRE.

Cómo lo explotan los atacantes

Ruta del atacante paso a paso

  1. 1

    The following method throws three types of exceptions.

  2. 2

    While it might seem tidier to write

  3. 3

    doing so hampers the caller's ability to understand and handle the exceptions that occur. Further, if a later revision of doExchange() introduces a new type of exception that should be treated differently than previous exceptions, there is no easy way to enforce this requirement.

  4. 4

    Early versions of C++ (C++98, C++03, C++11) included a feature known as Dynamic Exception Specification. This allowed functions to declare what type of exceptions it may throw. It is possible to declare a general class of exception to cover any derived exceptions that may be thrown.

  5. 5

    In the example above, the code declares that myfunction() can throw an exception of type "std::exception" thus hiding details about the possible derived exceptions that could potentially be thrown.

Ejemplo de código vulnerable

Vulnerable Java

While it might seem tidier to write

Vulnerable Java 
public void doExchange() throws Exception {
  	...
  }
Ejemplo de código seguro

Secure Java

The following method throws three types of exceptions.

Seguro Java 
public void doExchange() throws IOException, InvocationTargetException, SQLException {
  	...
  }
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Lista de prevención

How to prevent CWE-397

  • Architecture Use safe-by-default frameworks and APIs that prevent the unsafe pattern from being expressible.
  • Implementation Validate input at trust boundaries; use allowlists, not denylists.
  • Implementation Apply the principle of least privilege to credentials, file paths, and runtime permissions.
  • Testing Cover this weakness in CI: SAST rules + targeted unit tests for the data flow.
  • Operation Monitor logs for the runtime signals listed in the next section.
Señales de detección

How to detect CWE-397

Automated Static Analysis High

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)

Auto-corrección de Plexicus

Plexicus detecta automáticamente CWE-397 y abre un PR de corrección en menos de 60 segundos.

Codex Remedium escanea cada commit, identifica esta debilidad concreta y entrega un pull request listo para revisión con el parche. Sin tickets. Sin traspasos.

Solicitar demo Probar Plexicus gratis
Preguntas frecuentes

Frequently asked questions

¿Qué es CWE-397?

This vulnerability occurs when a method is declared to throw an overly broad exception type, such as a generic 'Exception' or 'Throwable'. This practice masks the specific error conditions that can occur, making it difficult for calling code to handle failures appropriately.

¿Qué gravedad tiene CWE-397?

MITRE no ha publicado una calificación de probabilidad de explotación para esta debilidad. Trátala como de impacto medio hasta que tu modelo de amenazas demuestre lo contrario.

¿Qué lenguajes o plataformas se ven afectados por CWE-397?

MITRE lists the following affected platforms: C++, C#, Java, Python.

¿Cómo puedo prevenir CWE-397?

Use safe-by-default frameworks, validate untrusted input at trust boundaries, and apply the principle of least privilege. Cover the data-flow signature in CI with SAST.

¿Cómo detecta y corrige Plexicus CWE-397?

El motor SAST de Plexicus detecta la firma de flujo de datos para CWE-397 en cada commit. Cuando hay coincidencia, nuestro agente Codex Remedium abre un PR de corrección con el código corregido, las pruebas y un resumen de una línea para el revisor.

¿Dónde puedo aprender más sobre CWE-397?

MITRE publica la definición canónica en https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/397.html. También puedes consultar la documentación de OWASP y NIST para guías relacionadas.

Debilidades relacionadas

Weaknesses related to CWE-397

CWE-705 Padre

Incorrect Control Flow Scoping

This vulnerability occurs when a program fails to return execution to the correct point in the code after finishing a specific operation…

CWE-248 Hermano

Uncaught Exception

This vulnerability occurs when a function throws an error or exception, but the calling code does not have a proper handler to catch and…

CWE-382 Hermano

J2EE Bad Practices: Use of System.exit()

This vulnerability occurs when a J2EE application directly calls System.exit(), which forcibly terminates the entire application server…

CWE-395 Hermano

Use of NullPointerException Catch to Detect NULL Pointer Dereference

Using a try-catch block for NullPointerException as a substitute for proper null checks is an anti-pattern. This approach masks the root…

CWE-396 Hermano

Declaration of Catch for Generic Exception

This weakness occurs when code catches a generic exception type like 'Exception' or 'Throwable', which can hide specific errors and create…

CWE-455 Hermano

Non-exit on Failed Initialization

This vulnerability occurs when software continues to run as normal after encountering a critical security failure during its startup…

CWE-584 Hermano

Return Inside Finally Block

This vulnerability occurs when a function places a return statement inside a finally block. This dangerous pattern silently discards any…

CWE-698 Hermano

Execution After Redirect (EAR)

Execution After Redirect (EAR) occurs when a web application sends a redirect response to a user's browser but continues to run…

Recursos

Further reading

Listo cuando tú lo estés

Deja de pagar por desarrollador.
Empieza a cerrar el bucle.

Plexicus es el ASPM nativo de IA que escanea, filtra, corrige, pentestea y explica — de forma autónoma. Desarrolladores ilimitados, repos ilimitados, acciones de IA de uso justo. Nivel gratuito real, €269/mo anual cuando estés listo.

Comenzar gratis Reservar una demo