Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Expression is Always True
This vulnerability occurs when code contains a conditional expression that will always evaluate to 'true', making the check ineffective and potentially bypassing critical security or logic gates.
What is CWE-571?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-571
Todavía no hay CVEs públicos enlazados a esta CWE en el catálogo de MITRE.
Ruta del atacante paso a paso
- 1
Identifica una ruta de código que maneje entrada no confiable sin validación.
- 2
Crea un payload que ejercite el comportamiento inseguro — inyección, traversal, overflow o abuso de lógica.
- 3
Envía el payload a través de una solicitud normal y observa la reacción de la aplicación.
- 4
Itera hasta que la respuesta filtre datos, ejecute código del atacante o escale privilegios.
Vulnerable Java
In the following Java example the updateInventory() method used within an e-business product ordering/inventory application will check if the input product number is in the store or in the warehouse. If the product is found, the method will update the store or warehouse database as well as the aggregate product database. If the product is not found, the method intends to do some special processing without updating any database.
public void updateInventory(String productNumber) {
boolean isProductAvailable = false;
boolean isDelayed = false;
if (productInStore(productNumber)) {
isProductAvailable = true;
updateInStoreDatabase(productNumber);
}
else if (productInWarehouse(productNumber)) {
isProductAvailable = true;
updateInWarehouseDatabase(productNumber);
}
else {
isProductAvailable = true;
}
if ( isProductAvailable ) {
updateProductDatabase(productNumber);
}
else if ( isDelayed ) {
```
/* Warn customer about delay before order processing */*
...}} Secure pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
return executeWithGuards(safe);
} How to prevent CWE-571
- Testing Use Static Analysis tools to spot such conditions.
How to detect CWE-571
Plexicus detecta automáticamente CWE-571 y abre un PR de corrección en menos de 60 segundos.
Codex Remedium escanea cada commit, identifica esta debilidad concreta y entrega un pull request listo para revisión con el parche. Sin tickets. Sin traspasos.
Frequently asked questions
¿Qué es CWE-571?
This vulnerability occurs when code contains a conditional expression that will always evaluate to 'true', making the check ineffective and potentially bypassing critical security or logic gates.
¿Qué gravedad tiene CWE-571?
MITRE no ha publicado una calificación de probabilidad de explotación para esta debilidad. Trátala como de impacto medio hasta que tu modelo de amenazas demuestre lo contrario.
¿Qué lenguajes o plataformas se ven afectados por CWE-571?
MITRE no ha especificado plataformas afectadas para esta CWE — puede aplicar a la mayoría de los stacks de aplicaciones.
¿Cómo puedo prevenir CWE-571?
Use Static Analysis tools to spot such conditions.
¿Cómo detecta y corrige Plexicus CWE-571?
El motor SAST de Plexicus detecta la firma de flujo de datos para CWE-571 en cada commit. Cuando hay coincidencia, nuestro agente Codex Remedium abre un PR de corrección con el código corregido, las pruebas y un resumen de una línea para el revisor.
¿Dónde puedo aprender más sobre CWE-571?
MITRE publica la definición canónica en https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/571.html. También puedes consultar la documentación de OWASP y NIST para guías relacionadas.
Weaknesses related to CWE-571
Improper Adherence to Coding Standards
This weakness occurs when developers don't consistently follow established coding standards and best practices, which can introduce…
Use of Redundant Code
This weakness occurs when a codebase contains identical or nearly identical logic duplicated across multiple functions, methods, or…
Architecture with Number of Horizontal Layers Outside of Expected Range
This occurs when a software system is built with either too many or too few distinct architectural layers, falling outside a recommended…
Invokable Control Element with Large Number of Outward Calls
This weakness occurs when a single function, method, or callable code block makes an excessively high number of calls to other objects or…
Insufficient Technical Documentation
This weakness occurs when a software or hardware product lacks comprehensive technical documentation. Missing or incomplete details about…
Insufficient Encapsulation
This weakness occurs when a software component exposes too much of its internal workings, such as data structures or implementation logic.…
Runtime Resource Management Control Element in a Component Built to Run on Application Servers
This weakness occurs when an application built to run on a managed application server bypasses the server's high-level APIs and instead…
Missing Serialization Control Element
This weakness occurs when a class or data structure is marked as serializable but lacks the required control methods to properly handle…
Inconsistency Between Implementation and Documented Design
This weakness occurs when the actual code implementation deviates from the intended design described in its official documentation,…
Deja de pagar por desarrollador.
Empieza a cerrar el bucle.
Plexicus es el ASPM nativo de IA que escanea, filtra, corrige, pentestea y explica — de forma autónoma. Desarrolladores ilimitados, repos ilimitados, acciones de IA de uso justo. Nivel gratuito real, €269/mo anual cuando estés listo.