For software, use Software Composition Analysis (SCA) tools, which automatically analyze products to identify third-party dependencies. Often, SCA tools can be used to link with known vulnerabilities in the dependencies that they detect. There are commercial and open-source alternatives, such as OWASP Dependency-Check [REF-1312]. Many languages or frameworks have package managers with similar capabilities, such as npm audit for JavaScript, pip-audit for Python, govulncheck for Go, and many others. Dynamic methods can detect loading of third-party components.
Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component
This vulnerability occurs when your software relies on an external library, framework, or module that contains known security flaws.
What is CWE-1395?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-1395
Todavía no hay CVEs públicos enlazados a esta CWE en el catálogo de MITRE.
Ruta del atacante paso a paso
- 1
Identifica una ruta de código que maneje entrada no confiable sin validación.
- 2
Crea un payload que ejercite el comportamiento inseguro — inyección, traversal, overflow o abuso de lógica.
- 3
Envía el payload a través de una solicitud normal y observa la reacción de la aplicación.
- 4
Itera hasta que la respuesta filtre datos, ejecute código del atacante o escale privilegios.
Vulnerable pseudo
MITRE no ha publicado un ejemplo de código para esta CWE. El patrón siguiente es ilustrativo — consulta Recursos para referencias canónicas.
// Example pattern — see MITRE for the canonical references.
function handleRequest(input) {
// Untrusted input flows directly into the sensitive sink.
return executeUnsafe(input);
} Secure pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
return executeWithGuards(safe);
} How to prevent CWE-1395
- Requirements / Policy In some industries such as healthcare [REF-1320] [REF-1322] or technologies such as the cloud [REF-1321], it might be unclear about who is responsible for applying patches for third-party vulnerabilities: the vendor, the operator/customer, or a separate service. Clarifying roles and responsibilities can be important to minimize confusion or unnecessary delay when third-party vulnerabilities are disclosed.
- Requirements Require a Bill of Materials for all components and sub-components of the product. For software, require a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) [REF-1247] [REF-1311].
- Architecture and Design / Implementation / Integration / Manufacturing Maintain a Bill of Materials for all components and sub-components of the product. For software, maintain a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM). According to [REF-1247], "An SBOM is a formal, machine-readable inventory of software components and dependencies, information about those components, and their hierarchical relationships."
- Operation / Patching and Maintenance Actively monitor when a third-party component vendor announces vulnerability patches; fix the third-party component as soon as possible; and make it easy for operators/customers to obtain and apply the patch.
- Operation / Patching and Maintenance Continuously monitor changes in each of the product's components, especially when the changes indicate new vulnerabilities, end-of-life (EOL) plans, etc.
How to detect CWE-1395
Plexicus detecta automáticamente CWE-1395 y abre un PR de corrección en menos de 60 segundos.
Codex Remedium escanea cada commit, identifica esta debilidad concreta y entrega un pull request listo para revisión con el parche. Sin tickets. Sin traspasos.
Frequently asked questions
¿Qué es CWE-1395?
This vulnerability occurs when your software relies on an external library, framework, or module that contains known security flaws.
¿Qué gravedad tiene CWE-1395?
MITRE no ha publicado una calificación de probabilidad de explotación para esta debilidad. Trátala como de impacto medio hasta que tu modelo de amenazas demuestre lo contrario.
¿Qué lenguajes o plataformas se ven afectados por CWE-1395?
MITRE lists the following affected platforms: Not OS-Specific, Not Architecture-Specific, Not Technology-Specific.
¿Cómo puedo prevenir CWE-1395?
In some industries such as healthcare [REF-1320] [REF-1322] or technologies such as the cloud [REF-1321], it might be unclear about who is responsible for applying patches for third-party vulnerabilities: the vendor, the operator/customer, or a separate service. Clarifying roles and responsibilities can be important to minimize confusion or unnecessary delay when third-party vulnerabilities are disclosed. Require a Bill of Materials for all components and sub-components of the product. For…
¿Cómo detecta y corrige Plexicus CWE-1395?
El motor SAST de Plexicus detecta la firma de flujo de datos para CWE-1395 en cada commit. Cuando hay coincidencia, nuestro agente Codex Remedium abre un PR de corrección con el código corregido, las pruebas y un resumen de una línea para el revisor.
¿Dónde puedo aprender más sobre CWE-1395?
MITRE publica la definición canónica en https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html. También puedes consultar la documentación de OWASP y NIST para guías relacionadas.
Weaknesses related to CWE-1395
Violation of Secure Design Principles
This weakness occurs when a system's architecture or design fails to follow fundamental security principles, creating a flawed foundation…
Improper Identifier for IP Block used in System-On-Chip (SOC)
This weakness occurs when a System-on-Chip (SoC) lacks a secure, unique, and permanent identifier for its internal hardware components (IP…
Execution with Unnecessary Privileges
This vulnerability occurs when software runs with higher permissions than it actually needs to perform its tasks. This excessive privilege…
Not Failing Securely ('Failing Open')
This vulnerability occurs when a system, upon encountering an error or failure, defaults to its least secure configuration instead of a…
Unnecessary Complexity in Protection Mechanism (Not Using 'Economy of Mechanism')
This weakness occurs when a security feature is implemented with excessive complexity, creating unnecessary risk. Overly intricate…
Not Using Complete Mediation
This vulnerability occurs when software fails to verify access permissions every single time a user or process tries to use a resource.…
Improper Isolation or Compartmentalization
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to enforce strong boundaries between components that operate at different security…
Reliance on a Single Factor in a Security Decision
This vulnerability occurs when a system's security check depends almost entirely on just one condition, object, or piece of data to decide…
Insufficient Psychological Acceptability
This weakness occurs when security features are so cumbersome or confusing that well-intentioned users feel forced to turn them off or…
Further reading
- MITRE — CWE-1395 oficial https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html
- The Unfortunate Reality of Insecure Libraries https://owasp.org/www-project-dependency-check/
- A06:2021 - Vulnerable and Outdated Components https://owasp.org/Top10/A06_2021-Vulnerable_and_Outdated_Components/
- Framing Software Component Transparency: Establishing a Common Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) https://www.ntia.gov/files/ntia/publications/ntia_sbom_framing_2nd_edition_20211021.pdf
- The Cases for Using the SBOMs We Build https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/AC_SBOM_IB_v2-002.pdf
- OWASP Dependency-Check https://owasp.org/www-project-dependency-check/
- ICS Alert (ICS-ALERT-20-063-01): SweynTooth Vulnerabilities https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-alerts/ics-alert-20-063-01
Deja de pagar por desarrollador.
Empieza a cerrar el bucle.
Plexicus es el ASPM nativo de IA que escanea, filtra, corrige, pentestea y explica — de forma autónoma. Desarrolladores ilimitados, repos ilimitados, acciones de IA de uso justo. Nivel gratuito real, €269/mo anual cuando estés listo.