Use known techniques for prompt injection and other attacks, and adjust the attacks to be more specific to the model or system.
Improper Validation of Generative AI Output
This vulnerability occurs when an application uses a generative AI model (like an LLM) but fails to properly check the AI's output before using it. Without this validation, the AI's responses might…
What is CWE-1426?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-1426
-
chain: GUI for ChatGPT API performs input validation but does not properly "sanitize" or validate model output data (CWE-1426), leading to XSS (CWE-79).
Ruta del atacante paso a paso
- 1
Identifica una ruta de código que maneje entrada no confiable sin validación.
- 2
Crea un payload que ejercite el comportamiento inseguro — inyección, traversal, overflow o abuso de lógica.
- 3
Envía el payload a través de una solicitud normal y observa la reacción de la aplicación.
- 4
Itera hasta que la respuesta filtre datos, ejecute código del atacante o escale privilegios.
Vulnerable pseudo
MITRE no ha publicado un ejemplo de código para esta CWE. El patrón siguiente es ilustrativo — consulta Recursos para referencias canónicas.
// Example pattern — see MITRE for the canonical references.
function handleRequest(input) {
// Untrusted input flows directly into the sensitive sink.
return executeUnsafe(input);
} Secure pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
return executeWithGuards(safe);
} How to prevent CWE-1426
- Architecture and Design Since the output from a generative AI component (such as an LLM) cannot be trusted, ensure that it operates in an untrusted or non-privileged space.
- Operation Use "semantic comparators," which are mechanisms that provide semantic comparison to identify objects that might appear different but are semantically similar.
- Operation Use components that operate externally to the system to monitor the output and act as a moderator. These components are called different terms, such as supervisors or guardrails.
- Build and Compilation During model training, use an appropriate variety of good and bad examples to guide preferred outputs.
How to detect CWE-1426
Use known techniques for prompt injection and other attacks, and adjust the attacks to be more specific to the model or system.
Review of the product design can be effective, but it works best in conjunction with dynamic analysis.
Plexicus detecta automáticamente CWE-1426 y abre un PR de corrección en menos de 60 segundos.
Codex Remedium escanea cada commit, identifica esta debilidad concreta y entrega un pull request listo para revisión con el parche. Sin tickets. Sin traspasos.
Frequently asked questions
¿Qué es CWE-1426?
This vulnerability occurs when an application uses a generative AI model (like an LLM) but fails to properly check the AI's output before using it. Without this validation, the AI's responses might contain security flaws, harmful content, or data leaks that violate the application's intended policies.
¿Qué gravedad tiene CWE-1426?
MITRE no ha publicado una calificación de probabilidad de explotación para esta debilidad. Trátala como de impacto medio hasta que tu modelo de amenazas demuestre lo contrario.
¿Qué lenguajes o plataformas se ven afectados por CWE-1426?
MITRE lists the following affected platforms: Not Architecture-Specific, AI/ML, Not Technology-Specific.
¿Cómo puedo prevenir CWE-1426?
Since the output from a generative AI component (such as an LLM) cannot be trusted, ensure that it operates in an untrusted or non-privileged space. Use "semantic comparators," which are mechanisms that provide semantic comparison to identify objects that might appear different but are semantically similar.
¿Cómo detecta y corrige Plexicus CWE-1426?
El motor SAST de Plexicus detecta la firma de flujo de datos para CWE-1426 en cada commit. Cuando hay coincidencia, nuestro agente Codex Remedium abre un PR de corrección con el código corregido, las pruebas y un resumen de una línea para el revisor.
¿Dónde puedo aprender más sobre CWE-1426?
MITRE publica la definición canónica en https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1426.html. También puedes consultar la documentación de OWASP y NIST para guías relacionadas.
Weaknesses related to CWE-1426
Improper Neutralization
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly validate or sanitize structured data before it's received from an external…
Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output
This vulnerability occurs when an application builds a structured message—like a query, command, or request—for another component but…
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements
This vulnerability occurs when an application accepts external input but fails to properly sanitize special characters or syntax that have…
Improper Null Termination
This weakness occurs when software fails to properly end a string or array with the required null character or equivalent terminator.
Encoding Error
This vulnerability occurs when software incorrectly transforms data between different formats, leading to corrupted or misinterpreted…
Collapse of Data into Unsafe Value
This vulnerability occurs when an application's data filtering or transformation process incorrectly merges or simplifies information,…
Improper Input Validation
This vulnerability occurs when an application accepts data from an external source but fails to properly verify that the data is safe and…
Improper Handling of Syntactically Invalid Structure
This vulnerability occurs when software fails to properly reject or process input that doesn't follow the expected format or structure,…
Improper Handling of Inconsistent Structural Elements
This vulnerability occurs when a system fails to properly manage situations where related data structures or elements should match but are…
Further reading
- MITRE — CWE-1426 oficial https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1426.html
- LLM02: Insecure Output Handling https://genai.owasp.org/llmrisk/llm02-insecure-output-handling/
- Validating Outputs https://cohere.com/blog/validating-llm-outputs
- NeMo Guardrails: A Toolkit for Controllable and Safe LLM Applications with Programmable Rails https://aclanthology.org/2023.emnlp-demo.40/
- Insecure output handling in LLMs https://learn.snyk.io/lesson/insecure-input-handling/
- Building Guardrails for Large Language Models https://arxiv.org/pdf/2402.01822
Deja de pagar por desarrollador.
Empieza a cerrar el bucle.
Plexicus es el ASPM nativo de IA que escanea, filtra, corrige, pentestea y explica — de forma autónoma. Desarrolladores ilimitados, repos ilimitados, acciones de IA de uso justo. Nivel gratuito real, €269/mo anual cuando estés listo.