Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Private Data Structure Returned From A Public Method
This vulnerability occurs when a public method directly returns a reference to a private, internal data structure. Because the reference is live, external callers can bypass intended controls and…
What is CWE-495?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-495
Todavía no hay CVEs públicos enlazados a esta CWE en el catálogo de MITRE.
Ruta del atacante paso a paso
- 1
Identifica una ruta de código que maneje entrada no confiable sin validación.
- 2
Crea un payload que ejercite el comportamiento inseguro — inyección, traversal, overflow o abuso de lógica.
- 3
Envía el payload a través de una solicitud normal y observa la reacción de la aplicación.
- 4
Itera hasta que la respuesta filtre datos, ejecute código del atacante o escale privilegios.
Vulnerable Java
Here, a public method in a Java class returns a reference to a private array. Given that arrays in Java are mutable, any modifications made to the returned reference would be reflected in the original private array.
private String[] colors;
public String[] getColors() {
return colors;
} Secure pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
return executeWithGuards(safe);
} How to prevent CWE-495
- Implementation Declare the method private.
- Implementation Clone the member data and keep an unmodified version of the data private to the object.
- Implementation Use public setter methods that govern how a private member can be modified.
How to detect CWE-495
Plexicus detecta automáticamente CWE-495 y abre un PR de corrección en menos de 60 segundos.
Codex Remedium escanea cada commit, identifica esta debilidad concreta y entrega un pull request listo para revisión con el parche. Sin tickets. Sin traspasos.
Frequently asked questions
¿Qué es CWE-495?
This vulnerability occurs when a public method directly returns a reference to a private, internal data structure. Because the reference is live, external callers can bypass intended controls and modify the data unexpectedly, corrupting the application's state.
¿Qué gravedad tiene CWE-495?
MITRE no ha publicado una calificación de probabilidad de explotación para esta debilidad. Trátala como de impacto medio hasta que tu modelo de amenazas demuestre lo contrario.
¿Qué lenguajes o plataformas se ven afectados por CWE-495?
MITRE lists the following affected platforms: C, C++, Java, C#.
¿Cómo puedo prevenir CWE-495?
Declare the method private. Clone the member data and keep an unmodified version of the data private to the object.
¿Cómo detecta y corrige Plexicus CWE-495?
El motor SAST de Plexicus detecta la firma de flujo de datos para CWE-495 en cada commit. Cuando hay coincidencia, nuestro agente Codex Remedium abre un PR de corrección con el código corregido, las pruebas y un resumen de una línea para el revisor.
¿Dónde puedo aprender más sobre CWE-495?
MITRE publica la definición canónica en https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/495.html. También puedes consultar la documentación de OWASP y NIST para guías relacionadas.
Weaknesses related to CWE-495
Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime
This vulnerability occurs when software fails to properly manage a resource throughout its entire lifecycle—from creation and active use…
Incorrect Access of Indexable Resource ('Range Error')
This vulnerability occurs when software fails to properly check the boundaries of an indexed resource, like an array, buffer, or file,…
Creation of Emergent Resource
This vulnerability occurs when a system's normal operations unintentionally create new, exploitable resources that attackers can use to…
Improper Preservation of Consistency Between Independent Representations of Shared State
This vulnerability occurs when a system with multiple independent components (like distributed services or separate hardware units) each…
Reliance on Component That is Not Updateable
This vulnerability occurs when a product depends on a component that cannot be updated or patched to fix security flaws or critical bugs.
Information Loss or Omission
This weakness occurs when an application fails to log critical security events or records them inaccurately, which can misguide security…
Incomplete Internal State Distinction
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to accurately track its own operational state. The system incorrectly assumes it's in…
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly manage a finite resource, allowing an attacker to exhaust it and cause a…
Improper Resource Shutdown or Release
This vulnerability occurs when a program fails to properly close or release a system resource—like a file handle, database connection, or…
Further reading
- MITRE — CWE-495 oficial https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/495.html
- Seven Pernicious Kingdoms: A Taxonomy of Software Security Errors https://samate.nist.gov/SSATTM_Content/papers/Seven%20Pernicious%20Kingdoms%20-%20Taxonomy%20of%20Sw%20Security%20Errors%20-%20Tsipenyuk%20-%20Chess%20-%20McGraw.pdf
Deja de pagar por desarrollador.
Empieza a cerrar el bucle.
Plexicus es el ASPM nativo de IA que escanea, filtra, corrige, pentestea y explica — de forma autónoma. Desarrolladores ilimitados, repos ilimitados, acciones de IA de uso justo. Nivel gratuito real, €269/mo anual cuando estés listo.