CWE-675 Clase Borrador

Multiple Operations on Resource in Single-Operation Context

This vulnerability occurs when a software component performs the same action on a resource multiple times, even though the action is designed to be executed only once. This redundant execution can…

Definición

What is CWE-675?

This vulnerability occurs when a software component performs the same action on a resource multiple times, even though the action is designed to be executed only once. This redundant execution can lead to unintended side effects, data corruption, or resource exhaustion.
Think of this like accidentally hitting 'send' on an email twice. The core issue is that a function or method lacks a proper guard to prevent re-execution on the same target. This often happens in event handlers that don't debounce user clicks, in loops with flawed termination conditions, or when cleanup and initialization routines incorrectly overlap. The duplicate operations waste system resources and can put the application or data into an inconsistent, unpredictable state. For developers, the fix involves implementing idempotence—ensuring an operation produces the same result whether it's run once or multiple times. This can be achieved by using flags to track completion, employing atomic operations, or designing APIs that safely handle repeated calls. Thorough testing with edge cases, especially around user interactions and error recovery paths, is crucial to catch this subtle but impactful flaw.
Impacto en el mundo real

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-675

  • Attacker provides invalid address to a memory-reading function, causing a mutex to be unlocked twice

  • file descriptor double close can cause the wrong file to be associated with a file descriptor.

  • XSS protection mechanism attempts to remove "/" that could be used to close tags, but it can be bypassed using double encoded slashes (%252F)

Cómo lo explotan los atacantes

Ruta del atacante paso a paso

  1. 1

    The following code shows a simple example of a double free vulnerability.

  2. 2

    Double free vulnerabilities have two common (and sometimes overlapping) causes:

  3. 3

    - Error conditions and other exceptional circumstances - Confusion over which part of the program is responsible for freeing the memory

  4. 4

    Although some double free vulnerabilities are not much more complicated than this example, most are spread out across hundreds of lines of code or even different files. Programmers seem particularly susceptible to freeing global variables more than once.

  5. 5

    This code binds a server socket to port 21, allowing the server to listen for traffic on that port.

Ejemplo de código vulnerable

Vulnerable C

The following code shows a simple example of a double free vulnerability.

Vulnerable C
char* ptr = (char*)malloc (SIZE);
  ...
  if (abrt) {
  	free(ptr);
  }
  ...
  free(ptr);
Ejemplo de código seguro

Secure pseudo

Seguro pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Lista de prevención

How to prevent CWE-675

  • Architecture Use safe-by-default frameworks and APIs that prevent the unsafe pattern from being expressible.
  • Implementation Validate input at trust boundaries; use allowlists, not denylists.
  • Implementation Apply the principle of least privilege to credentials, file paths, and runtime permissions.
  • Testing Cover this weakness in CI: SAST rules + targeted unit tests for the data flow.
  • Operation Monitor logs for the runtime signals listed in the next section.
Señales de detección

How to detect CWE-675

SAST High

Ejecuta análisis estático (SAST) sobre el código buscando el patrón inseguro en el flujo de datos.

DAST Moderate

Ejecuta pruebas dinámicas de seguridad de aplicaciones (DAST) contra el endpoint en vivo.

Runtime Moderate

Vigila los logs en tiempo de ejecución para detectar trazas de excepción inusuales, entradas malformadas o intentos de bypass de autorización.

Code review Moderate

Revisión de código: marca cualquier código nuevo que maneje entrada desde esta superficie sin usar los helpers validados del framework.

Auto-corrección de Plexicus

Plexicus detecta automáticamente CWE-675 y abre un PR de corrección en menos de 60 segundos.

Codex Remedium escanea cada commit, identifica esta debilidad concreta y entrega un pull request listo para revisión con el parche. Sin tickets. Sin traspasos.

Preguntas frecuentes

Frequently asked questions

¿Qué es CWE-675?

This vulnerability occurs when a software component performs the same action on a resource multiple times, even though the action is designed to be executed only once. This redundant execution can lead to unintended side effects, data corruption, or resource exhaustion.

¿Qué gravedad tiene CWE-675?

MITRE no ha publicado una calificación de probabilidad de explotación para esta debilidad. Trátala como de impacto medio hasta que tu modelo de amenazas demuestre lo contrario.

¿Qué lenguajes o plataformas se ven afectados por CWE-675?

MITRE no ha especificado plataformas afectadas para esta CWE — puede aplicar a la mayoría de los stacks de aplicaciones.

¿Cómo puedo prevenir CWE-675?

Use safe-by-default frameworks, validate untrusted input at trust boundaries, and apply the principle of least privilege. Cover the data-flow signature in CI with SAST.

¿Cómo detecta y corrige Plexicus CWE-675?

El motor SAST de Plexicus detecta la firma de flujo de datos para CWE-675 en cada commit. Cuando hay coincidencia, nuestro agente Codex Remedium abre un PR de corrección con el código corregido, las pruebas y un resumen de una línea para el revisor.

¿Dónde puedo aprender más sobre CWE-675?

MITRE publica la definición canónica en https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/675.html. También puedes consultar la documentación de OWASP y NIST para guías relacionadas.

Debilidades relacionadas

Weaknesses related to CWE-675

CWE-573 Padre

Improper Following of Specification by Caller

This weakness occurs when software fails to properly follow the documented rules, protocols, or requirements of an external component it…

CWE-103 Hermano

Struts: Incomplete validate() Method Definition

This vulnerability occurs in a Struts application when a validator form either completely omits a validate() method or includes one but…

CWE-104 Hermano

Struts: Form Bean Does Not Extend Validation Class

This vulnerability occurs in Apache Struts applications when a form bean class does not properly extend the framework's validation class.…

CWE-243 Hermano

Creation of chroot Jail Without Changing Working Directory

This vulnerability occurs when a program creates a chroot jail but fails to change its current working directory afterward. Because the…

CWE-253 Hermano

Incorrect Check of Function Return Value

This vulnerability occurs when a program misinterprets or improperly validates the return value from a function, causing it to miss…

CWE-296 Hermano

Improper Following of a Certificate's Chain of Trust

This vulnerability occurs when software fails to properly validate the entire certificate chain back to a trusted root authority. This…

CWE-304 Hermano

Missing Critical Step in Authentication

This vulnerability occurs when a software authentication process omits a required step, weakening its overall security.

CWE-325 Hermano

Missing Cryptographic Step

This vulnerability occurs when a software implementation skips a critical step in a cryptographic process, resulting in security that is…

CWE-329 Hermano

Generation of Predictable IV with CBC Mode

This vulnerability occurs when software uses a predictable or reused Initialization Vector (IV) with Cipher Block Chaining (CBC) mode…

Listo cuando tú lo estés

Deja de pagar por desarrollador.
Empieza a cerrar el bucle.

Plexicus es el ASPM nativo de IA que escanea, filtra, corrige, pentestea y explica — de forma autónoma. Desarrolladores ilimitados, repos ilimitados, acciones de IA de uso justo. Nivel gratuito real, €269/mo anual cuando estés listo.